Answer:
Negative punishment
Explanation:
Punishment
This is simply an act or an event that tends to reduce/decrease the behavior that it follows it.
Positive punishment
This is when a behavior is accompanied quickly by the presence of a stimulus that reduces the future occurrence of the said behavior.
Negative punishment
This is commonly known as a response behavior that is accompanied quickly by the removal of a stimulus or a decline in the intensity of the stimulus, that therefore reduces the future occurrence of similar responses under similar conditions.
Punishment often tends to weakens or reduces the probability of a behavior occurring again.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
For the purpose of understanding and solving issues on foreign policy on international disputes, research respondents have recognized specific components that would facilitate them to nominate an expert as an arbitrator in international arbitration.
Even though experts (both technical and legal) is obvious choice quality for an arbitral judiciary in international arbitration, there are cases of using non-expert but diplomats taking importance participants' view
Hence, it is TRUE that a democratic society runs the risk of over-reacting or under-reacting in the foreign policy arena because experts are not the sole arbitrators of what course of action to pursue
The answer would be that stress rises from both the occurrences and our cognitive appraisal of them. Cognitive appraisal means that it is the personal understanding of a condition that eventually influences the degree to which the situation is professed as stressful.
Answer:
Explanation:
Just so you understand more deeply. There is more than one answer for this question, "as it is written". Math can be like this sometimes. And it can cause a lot of confusion. You must read it very carefully. If you multiply 8 x 4 you get 32. You know that (? x 7) must be greater that that number because you subtract (? x 3). If you multiply 5 x 7 you get 35. And that is greater than 32. Then take 32 from 35 to get 3. So that (5 x 7) - (1 x 3) also gives 32. If ? is assumed to be the same value for both (? x 7) and (? x 3). Then the problem can be solved by the rules of algebra, as it was done by Vivian. Any other analysis can give you other possible answers. If this is the case, then there must be some more to the question. You are not told that ? = ?. But this must be the case. And ? is an "operator", not just a question mark. To get just one answer, they must both be 8. You just use the "math rules" to move things around until you find the way to the answer. Scientists sometimes do this for months or years to solve complicated problems.
Often, your number sense gets confused by this kind of "discrepancy" or not knowing where to start situation, when you go beyond simple math and into algebra concepts. And this can leave you lost and not knowing where to start. If the general question is put to you to solve the problem by algebra concepts. You can assume more into the question by applying the rules of algebra. In algebra, symbols are used instead of numbers. This is part of the "math rules". Then the other rules are used to find the answer. The symbol ? is just as valid as x or y or whatever. In science you sometimes even use words. (That is how word problems are built.) Once you know the "math rules". You can apply logic to solve math problems.
I send this answer to give you a deeper understanding of what you are doing. You are learning basic rules now. Knowing what is causing your confusion can make things easier in the future. Jut play with the "ok" math maneuvers (+, -, multiplication, division) until you can do them without thinking. And math will become easy. There are more "math rules" that you will learn later. You will "see" the answers easier later. After you get more experience. Don't expect this now. The key to easy math is practice.
