It was a chain reaction. Long story short, the countries were pulled into the war because of agreements they had with their allies. This treaty is what caused the countries to enter WWI, to protect and defend their allied countries who were already in the war.
The impact of was: <span>A. It surveyed and organized the western lands.
It was one of the accomplishments that made after the enaction of Articles of Confederation.
The ordinance separated the western lands into several parts and sold it with a cheap price for the businessman who want to conduct an agricultural business</span>
Answer:
The United States contributes to the end of World War II in Europe and in Pacific as given below.
Explanation:
During World War II, the United States began to provide military supplies and support to the Allies. In the final battles in the European Theatre, American played a vital role by helping the British forces in the D-Day when Nazi Germany surrenders its armed forces in 1945, marking the end of World War II in Europe.
After the attack on the Pearl Harbour, American entered into war and tried to capture the Pacific, which was under the control of Japan. Japan saw territorial expansion in Asia and the Pacific Ocean. The purpose was to become a superpower in Asia. The victory of the Battle of Midway (in 1942) played an influential role for the United States because they stopped Japan in expanding its power in the Pacific through defeating Japanese naval power.
Answer: Africans were forbidden from buying or leasing land outside those reserves. Europeans, likewise, were unable to buy or lease land from Africans.
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
No, I don't think that any of these industries are morally wrong?
As the passage in the Bible says: "the one who is not guilty of nothing can throw the first rock," which menas that nobody has granted us the right to judge.
It is true that there are many industries that are controversial among animal advocacy groups. Some of these include rodeos, horse racing, circuses, hunting,
Many of these companies do not have the proper facilities or the proper care for animals. But that is not the case of all.
Although this is a controversial issue, some of these companies take care of animals and employ hundreds of people that support their families and pay taxes. Furthermore, they fulfill an important function in the entertainment industry.
So my suggestion would be that federal and state regulations could be more strict to protect animals, by closing those industries is not the better option.
