1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tpy6a [65]
3 years ago
12

During a recent lengthy strike at Morell Manufacturing Company, management replaced striking assembly line workers with office w

orkers. The assembly line workers had been paid $18 per hour while the office workers are only paid $10 per hour. What is the most likely effect on the labor variances in the first month of this strike? Labor Rate Variance Labor Efficiency Variance A) Unfavorable No effect B) No effect Unfavorable C) Unfavorable Favorable D) Favorable Unfavorable
Business
1 answer:
Jobisdone [24]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: D) Favorable Unfavorable

Explanation:

To begin, it is worthy of note that in Variance, if something is said to be Favourable, it means a negative Variance because less resources than planned were spent. When it is Unfavourable, it means a positive balance variance.

Now, The formula for Labour Rate Variance is as follows,

LABOUR RATE VARIANCE=(ACTUAL RATE-STANDARD RATE)*ACTUAL HOURS WORKED

Seeing as the old workers were being paid $18, and the new office ones were paid $10, we can see that to be the actual rate was less than the standard rate. This would mean that there was a FAVOURABLE balance.

Labour Efficiency is calculated in a similar way,

LABOUR EFFICIENCY VARIANCE=(ACTUAL HOURS WORKED-STANDARD HOURS)*STANDARD RATE.

Now, these are Office workers not assemblyline workers. They do not have the experience to work in such a way that they produce as fast or as efficiently as their striking Assemblyline colleagues.

This would then mean that their actual hours will be MORE than the standard rate which can only lead to an UNFAVOURABLE BALANCE.

You might be interested in
In a small, closed economy, national income (GDP) is $ 500.00 million for the current month. Individuals have spent $ 300.00 mil
alexdok [17]

Answer:

The total investment in the economy is $50 million

Explanation:

The following equation is used to calculate the GDP: GDP = C + I + G + (X – M) or GDP = private consumption + gross investment + government investment + government spending + (exports – imports)

Using this formula we can determine the amount of investment.

Investment = 500 (GDP) - 300 (private consumption) - 150 (government spending) = $50.

4 0
3 years ago
Breakmorning Corporation produces a product that requires 2.6 pounds of materials per unit. The allowance for waste is 0.3 pound
Rasek [7]

Answer:

Total= $4.33

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Breakmorning Corporation produces a product that requires 2.6 pounds of materials per unit. The allowance for waste is 0.3 pounds; the allowance for spoilage is 0.1 pounds. The purchase price is $4 per pound, but a 2% discount is always taken. Freight costs are $0.15 per pound and receiving and handling costs are $0.10 per pound.

Purchase price= 4*0.98= 3.92

Allowance for waste= (0.03*3.92)= 0.1176

Allowance for spoilage= (0.01*3.92)= 0.0392

Freight= 0.15

Receiving and handling= 0.10

Total= $4.33

4 0
3 years ago
After you have put a marketing plan in place,it is importantly to do what
statuscvo [17]
I found the options online. it would be to monitor the results
3 0
3 years ago
Bryan Inc. produces a specialty top-quality juice machine. The product, the JM50, requires four processes to be completed. Speci
laiz [17]

Answer:

3,000,000 juicers

Explanation:

<em>Maximum numbers per workstation in 30 days: </em>

Exterior construction = 100,000*30 = 3,000,000

Pulp filter = 25,000*24/6*30 = 3,000,000

Painting = 3,000*24/0.5*30 = 4,320,000

Packaging = 5,000*24*30 = 3,600,000.

The lowest of the numbers above is 3,120,000 and that means that Bryan inc. can manufacture 3,000,000 juicers.

3 0
3 years ago
(Last Word) According to Yale University's Environmental Performance Index (EPI), A) growth in GDP per person initially improves
tatiyna

Answer:

B) countries with higher GDP per person tend to have healthier environments.

Explanation:

According to the 2020 Environmental Performance Index (EPI) elaborated by Yale and Columbia universities, a strong positive correlation exists between high GDP per capita and healthier environments. There are a few exceptions to this correlation, in Asian (especially Arab) countries where GDP per capita might be high, but the vast majority of income is received by a vary small number of people. But in the rest of the world, a high GDP per capita generally results in healthier environments.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What fact or facts support a situation where trade is advantageous?
    15·1 answer
  • Label each scenario below according to the type of financial asset described.
    12·1 answer
  • F your own idea,why does a business exist.?​
    15·1 answer
  • Bill has always taken his dry cleaning to Tom's Dry Cleaning, Inc. One morning while Bill is in a hurry, he walks in the door of
    10·1 answer
  • When Red Arc Enterprises, a shipping company was merged with a larger shipping company, there was a strong resistance to change
    15·1 answer
  • Two costs at Bradshaw Company appear below for specific months of operation. Month Amount Units Produced Delivery costs Septembe
    11·1 answer
  • Price elasticity of demand measures Select one: A. how responsive sales are to changes in the price of a related good. B. how re
    13·2 answers
  • Every T account has two sides, credit and credit side.<br><br>True<br>False​
    10·1 answer
  • Batman parked the Batmobile himself and kept the bat keys. There was no attendant at the lot. Two hours later, Batman left the r
    7·1 answer
  • Need answer ASAP if in next 5mins I'll name first answer brainliest
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!