1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
snow_lady [41]
3 years ago
11

Snipe Company has been purchasing a component, Part Q, for $19.20 a unit. Snipe is currently operating at 70% of capacity and no

significant increase in production is anticipated in the near future. The cost of manufacturing a unit of Part Q, determined by absorption costing methods, is estimated as follows:
Direct materials $11.50

Direct labor 4.50

Variable factory overhead 1.12

Fixed factory overhead 3.15

Total $20.27

Calculate the income (loss) per unit for the company to (1) buy the product and the (2) differential effect on income, and (3) determine the decision the company should make.
Business
1 answer:
Elodia [21]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

See Explanation.

Explanation:

The company is incurring a relevant loss on purchase of Q rather than manufacturing it as,

When there is spare capacity only the relevant costs are identified to see if the decision to buy or make is worth it.

Since the factory fixed overhead is to be paid regardless of manufacturing Q, it should not be included in the estimations and the total cost of manufacturing Q should be

Direct Material + Direct Labor + Variable overheads

So Direct costs = 11.5 + 4.5 + 1.12 = $17.12

So the loss the company is incurring by purchasing Q = $19.20 - 17.12

Loss = $2.08/Q

Differential effect on the income is $2.08/ purchase of Q.

This can be avoided and thus Snipe should consider manufacturing Q rather than purchasing it as relevant direct costs give it an opportunity to make savings as there are no planned increases in production anyway.

Hope that helps.

You might be interested in
ABC Company sold the rights to use one of their patented processes that will result in them receiving cash payments of $10,000 a
BigorU [14]

Answer:

$77,217

$11,289

Explanation:

Fist we will calculate the present value of $10,000 payment

A fix Payment for a specified period of time is called annuity. The discounting of these payment on a specified rate is known as present value of annuity. The value of the annuity is also determined by the present value of annuity payment.

Formula for Present value of annuity is as follow

PV of annuity = P x [ ( 1- ( 1+ r )^-n ) / r ]

Where

P = Annual payment = $10,000

r = rate of return = 10% / 2  = 5%

n = number of period = 5 years x 2 semiannual payments per year = 10 payments

PV of annuity = $10,000 x [ ( 1- ( 1+ 0.05 )^-10 ) / 0.05 ]

PV of Annuity = $77,217

Now we will use the discounting method to calculate the present value of lump sum payment of $20,000

Present value = Future value x Present value factor

PV = FV x ( 1 + r )^-n

PV = $20,000 x ( 1 + 0.1 )^-6

PV = $11,289

6 0
3 years ago
A producer's market means higher prices.<br><br><br> True False
ahrayia [7]
The answer is True .
6 0
3 years ago
If the exchange rate for Canadian and U.S. dollars is 0.92777 to 1, this implies that 13 Canadian dollars will buy ____ worth of
Mazyrski [523]

Answer:

U.S. dollars = 14.012 U.S. dollars

Explanation:

Below is the exchange rate:

0.92777 Canadian dollars = 1 U.S dollars

Thus to find the amount of U.S. dollars bought from the 13 Canadian dollars, just divide the 13 Canadian dollars from 0.92777. Therefore the resulting answer will be the U.S. dollars.

U.S. dollars = 13 / 0.92777

U.S. dollars = 14.012 U.S. dollars

8 0
3 years ago
4. The finest veal is _______-fed. <br><br> A. field<br> B. grass<br> C. grain<br> D. milk
wlad13 [49]

Answer:

The finest veal is milk-fed.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Company uses the direct​ write-off method to account for uncollectible receivables. On April ​18, Wears wrote off a $ 6 comma 10
vlabodo [156]

Answer:

On April ​18, Wears wrote off a $ 6 comma 100 account receivable from customer W. Jalan

Debit Bad debt expense $6,100

Credit Accounts receivable  $6,100

Being entries to write off debts due from W. Jalan

On May ​24, Wears unexpectedly received full payment from Jalan on the previously written off account

Debit Cash account $6,100

Credit Bad debt expense $6,100

Being entries to record cash collected for debt previously written off

Explanation:

Ordinarily, When a company makes sales on account, debit accounts receivable and credit sales. Based on assessment, some or all of the receivables may be uncollectible.  

To account for this, debit bad debit expense and credit allowance for doubtful debt. Should the debt become uncollectible (i.e go bad), debit allowance for doubtful debt and credit accounts receivable.

Where a debit that had previously been determined to have gone bad gets settled, debit cash and credit bad debt expense.

However, these entries are posted directly between the bad debt expense account and the accounts receivable if the company uses the  direct write off method.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The static budget, at the beginning of the month, for Beacon Banner Company follows:
    14·1 answer
  • "Under the California Insurance Code, there are no _______ for life or health insurance in California."
    15·1 answer
  • Real estate is an attractive investment because it
    12·1 answer
  • Which ERP component can help an organization predict such things as the identification of individuals who are likely to leave th
    14·1 answer
  • Prebankruptcy counseling includes all of the following except:
    6·1 answer
  • When Glenn is thirsty, he always buys a Coke. Like many consumers, Glenn engages in considerable alternative evaluation when buy
    10·1 answer
  • Barry's Hobbies produces and sells a luxury animal pillow for $80.00 per unit. In this month of operation, 3,000 units were prod
    9·1 answer
  • SwiftyCompany is considering two capital investment proposals. Estimates regarding each project are provided below:
    5·1 answer
  • If asset owners in Japan and the United States consider Japanese and U.S. assets as good substitutes for each other and if the U
    13·1 answer
  • Employees who are part of the chain of command that is responsible for achieving organizational goals.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!