Unequal distribution of rewards between men and women, reflecting their different positions in a social hierarchy is referred to as <u>gender stratification</u>.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Gender stratification means segregating or ranking based on gender. Men were given high social ranking compared to women. In simple, gender stratification is known as gender inequality.
The prestige, social value and personal freedom were not common for both men and women. Women were always restricted in these criteria. This affects their position in the social hierarchy.
The role of men or women in politics clearly reveals the stratification based on gender. Men were given higher authority whereas women were constricted.
Answer:
My lab and blackboard mastering are both connected to each other.
Explanation:
When you access my lab and the mastering course, you have to your own password and account. When you link Pearson my lab to the mastering blackboard you have to make a connection between both links. You have to connect links accounts. When your account get linked, you need not to connect your link again and again. You will found that your link related to blackboard and Pearson both were connected.
First click tools - click Pearson lab or my lab - tool page will appear - click on select on my lab - use to the content - click on get started.
Semi-arid is the climate of the Sahel (orange)
Answer:
French found great amount of furs in North America.
Explanation:
People were willing to pay a lot of money for furs in Europe. So, French people traded with Indians for furs and then took fur back and sold in Europe to earn profits. This was their main motive to colonize in America. Then they also moved to colonize in Ohio valley. King Louis XIV from France wanted to rule the New World. French associated in a friendly way through trade, marriage or by converting religiously.
France found many colonies in eastern North America, in Caribbean islands, and in South America. In contrast to France, Spain colonized for gold and silver.
Answer:
cooperation and competition are based on personality characteristics that are consistent across social situations.
Explanation:
According to the experiment done by Samuels, Liberman, and Ross (2004); in which they assigned the participants who have already been identified as cooperative and competitive performed accordingly. The participants, who have been considered as competitive performed more competitively as compared to participants being considered as cooperative, because an individual's personality characteristics remain same or consistent through various social situations.