Answer:
If I remember correctly it was Jack, I hope this helps!
Answer:
Option C:- raise an objection to his own opinion and counter that argument
Explanation:
On May 31, 1988 President Ronald Reagan addressed the students and faculty at Moscow State University (MSU). Although previous presidents desired such an opportunity, no other U.S. president except Richard M. Nixon had stood east of the Berlin Wall and spoken directly to the citizens of the Soviet Union. That Reagan would have such an opportunity was highly unlikely. Reagan appeared to be an implacable foe of the Soviet Union, previously calling it an "evil empire," describing it as "the focus of evil in the modern world," and accusing the Soviet "regime" of being "barbaric."
Thus, Reagan equated freedom with progress. Specifically, his thesis argued that human rights equal individual freedom; freedom equals individual creativity; individual creativity equals technological progress. The essence of the argument in Reagan's MSU address can be summarized as follows:
There is a revolution taking place. It is spreading around the globe.
The difference between the Sioux tribe and the Cherokee tribe is seen in their languages and the things they do trade in.
<h3>How did the Cherokee tribe differ from other tribes?</h3>
The Cherokee is known to be the tribe that is called “five civilized” tribes due to their efforts to take in the American culture due to the European system of values and that of their ideals.
Note that the Cherokee are known to be seen to have settled in the area that makes up what is now seen as the five U.S. states, making up of Eastern North Carolina, for about 500 years ago.
Note that the Cherokee are seen as a trading conduit that often exist between the peoples of the coast and those of the Mississippi Valley. and therefore, The difference between the Sioux tribe and the Cherokee tribe is seen in their languages and the things they do trade in.
Learn more about Cherokee tribe from
brainly.com/question/23601626
#SPJ1
Answer:
“Gentlemen,” he was saying “I shall be brief, but I would like to use my remaining time with you to
remind you that this case is not a difficult one, it requires no minute sifting of complicated facts, but it does
require you to be sure beyond a reasonable doubt as to the guilt of the defendant. To begin with, this case should
never have come to trial. This case is as simple as black and white.
Explanation:
