Answer:
I think it's D because it used spatial text (And - which is an addition transition word).
Explanation:
I really hope it helps you, please mark brainiest :)
Laura's friend counterclaim is appropriate because IT IS BOTH DEFENSIBLE AND ARGUABLE.
The correct option is C.
Explanation:
Driver's education in school is valuable, this is because most teens, who are just starting out to learn driving are students attending different schools in the country. Incorporating driver's education into the school curriculum system will go a long way in reducing the number of teenage automobile accidents that are recorded in the country on a yearly basis.
Previous studies have shown that teenagers and cars are usually dangerous combination; this is because, automobile accident has been recognized as the number cause of death for teenagers between the ages of 15 and 20.
Studies also show that in USA, about 13.2 millions of all drivers in the country are teenagers and an average of nine teenagers are killed everyday as a result of motor accidents.
Knowledge is power, if the knowledge of safe driving is impacted on the students in schools, it will contribute significantly to reducing the number of teenager deaths that are recorded every year.
PLZZZ BRAINLIEST I ONLY NEED ONE MOREE
Question: In order to reach fundamental convictions that he can call his own, Descartes decides to sweep aside all the opinions he had learned “at school.” However he is careful to distinguish his position from that of the skeptics. What is the distinction he makes?
Answer:
Descartes is untroubled by the fact that, as he has described them, mind and matter are very different: One is spatial and the other not, and therefore one cannot act upon the other. ... It is the nature of bodies to be in space, and the nature of minds not to be in space, Descartes claims.
Answer:
I believe it I mean, they have a point. I want(desire) my family and friends to live, but if I didn't then I would not suffer the loss. Another example, I was once really close to winning a Mario Kart tournament among friends and I lost because this one guy threw a blue shell at me and the reward for winning was 10bucks from each of us. I wanted (desired) that cash, and I got upset because I didn't win and then had to pay up to the winner. But it's fine, I didn't stay upset for long just a minute or two as the realization I lost set in. No point in pondering your losses when you can look towards your future victories.
Explanation:
You asked a question and I responded.
I think that this is a very hard question to answer. I think that many kings, fictional or not, possess both the bad and good traits of being a king.
In regards to Macbeth, he certainly possessed the ambition many would wish for a king. He was brave, as noted by Duncan and the title of the Thane of Cawdor. He was protective, as noted by his murder of Banquo. Macbeth was even proud, as seen by his desire to keep the new title of Thane before taking the crown.
Unfortunately, many of the characteristics one would align with being a good king made Macbeth a bad king as well. Macbeth was too ambitious--as seen by his murdering Duncan. He was too protective--as seen by his inability to interpret the apparitions warnings in the correct way. Lastly, he was too proud--as seen by his refusal to leave the castle as Birnam Wood "moved" against him.
Like anything, one must always have control. Too much of anything normally turns out to be a bad thing. Therefore, depending upon one's individual views, Macbeth could be both a bad king or a good one.
BTW: It's free real estate.
