1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gennadij [26K]
3 years ago
11

describe the embargo act 1807, and at least three issues which arose form the act that worked to divide the nation and ultimatel

y caused the act to be rescinded
History
2 answers:
Nataly [62]3 years ago
5 0
The Embargo Act of 1807 was a general trade embargo on all foreign nations that was enacted by the US Congress. As a successor or replacement law for the 1806 Non-importation Act and passed as the Napoleonic Wars continued, it represented an escalation of attempts to coerce Britain to stop its impressment of American sailors and to respect American sovereignty and neutrality but also attempted to pressure France and other nations in the pursuit of In the first decade of the 19th century, American merchant shipping grew. Particularly Britain but also France thus targeted neutral American shipping as a means to disrupt enemy trade. American merchantmen, their cargo, and sometimes crew members were seized as contraband of war by European navies, sometimes under cover of official orders. The British Royal Navy, in particular, resorted to impressment and forced some American seamen into naval service on the pretext that the seamen had been "born British" and were still British subjects. Americans saw the Chesapeake–Leopard affair as a glaring example of a British violation of American neutrality.

Congress imposed the embargo in direct response to these events. US President Thomas Jefferson acted with restraint, weighed public support for retaliation, and recognized that the United States was far weaker than either Britain or France. He recommended that Congress respond with commercial warfare, a policy that appealed to Jefferson both for being experimental and for foreseeably harming his domestic political opponents more than his allies, whatever its effect on the European belligerents. The 10th Congress was controlled by his allies and agreed to the Act, which was signed into law on December 22, 1807.

The embargo failed totally. It did not improve the American diplomatic position, highlighted American weakness and lack of leverage, significantly damaged only the American economy, and sharply increased domestic political tensions. Both widespread evasion of the embargo and loopholes in the legislation reduced its impact on its targets. British commercial shipping, which already dominated global trade, was successfully adapting to Napoleon's Continental System by pursuing new markets, particularly in the restive Spanish and Portuguese South American colonies. Thus, British shippers were well-positioned to grow at American expense when the embargo reduced American trade activity.

The embargo undermined American unity by provoking bitter protests, particularly in New England commercial centers. Support for the declining Federalist Party, which intensely opposed Jefferson, temporarily rebounded and drove electoral gains in 1808. The embargo simultaneously undermined Americans' faith that their government could execute laws fairly and strengthened the European perception that the republican form of government was inept and ineffectual.

Replacement legislation for the ineffective embargo was enacted on March 1, 1809, in the last days of Jefferson's presidency. Tensions with Britain continued to grow and eventually led to the War of 1812. general diplomatic and economic leverage.
ludmilkaskok [199]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

President Thomas Jefferson hoped that the Embargo Act of 1807 would help the United States by demonstrating to Britain and France their dependence on American goods, convincing them to respect American neutrality and stop impressing American seamen. Instead, the act had a devastating effect on American trade.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What key information and ideas have grown in this study of Arizona Statehood?
wlad13 [49]

Answer:

Until the Mexican-American War (1846–48) only a few Americans—explorers, soldiers, trappers, sheep drivers—visited Arizona. In 1851 the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers sent several expeditions into Arizona to find a suitable route on which to build a wagon road to California. To protect travelers, miners, and other settlers from Native Americans, the U.S. government began to locate army posts at key sites. In 1883 workers completed the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway across northern Arizona, thereby linking St. Louis, Missouri, with California; that same year the Southern Pacific Railroad completed a line from New Orleans to Los Angeles by way of Tucson and Yuma.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
How many Americans died in the raid on Columbus, NM? a. 0 c. 19 b. 5 d. 90
sammy [17]

Answer: 19 Americans died 90 Mexicans died

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Please help me hurry I’ll mark as brainlest if it’s right pleaseeee thank youuuu
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

I think B.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Describe the relationship between humans and the natural environment
RUDIKE [14]
Humans change their environment both positively and negatively and the environment affects how humans live in many different ways. The main interactions between humans and our environment can be grouped into the use of resources and the production of wastes.
8 0
3 years ago
Do you agree or disagree w/ Cortes decision to burn the ships? Explain
Nataliya [291]

Hernan Cortes (1485-1547) was a Spanish colonizer and conqueror, who leaded the conquest of the Mexican territories, that started in 1519 with the occupation of Veracruz. The tales about the sacking of the Mexican capital, Tenochtitlan, are still legendary nowadays.

After the takeover of Veracruz, Cortes gave the order of sinking his own ships (it was thought they were burnt, but nowadays that hypothesis is being questioned). Anyway, he destroyed his ships on purpouse to force his men to go forward and conquer the New World, both in the militar and spiritual (goal of spreading the Christian religion) dimensions.

  • Agreement with his decision: of course it is an incredibly effective manner of ensuring that his men would be motivated to conquer the territory, mainly because they did not have an alternative choice. They had to become rulers there or be lost in the middle of unknown lands. It can be claimed how the ultimate goal justifies the means.
  • Disagreement with the decision: it can be argued how unethical is that he prevented his men from deciding if they wanted to participate or not on the mission. He eliminated the choice.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is an example of changing gender roles?
    14·2 answers
  • To what larger body of water did the people living along these rivers sail
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following amendments prohibited denial of the right to vote because of race, but not gender?
    12·1 answer
  • The purpose of OPEC, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, is to Question 10 options: A stabilize the price of oil
    12·2 answers
  • Quien es argeos por que estaba en peligro
    11·2 answers
  • How did Franklin D Roosevelt court packing plan seek to change the make up of the Supreme Court
    6·1 answer
  • How did Harry Truman's presidency impact the civil rights of African-Americans during the late 1940's and early 1950's?
    15·1 answer
  • The major benefit of having the elastic clause in the United States Constitution is that it
    14·1 answer
  • Which territory caused the most debate about imperialism for the U.S.?
    11·1 answer
  • ¿que impacto tuvieron las ideas políticas y económicas liberales en Europa y América durante el siglo XIX?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!