To protect consumers from potentially dangerous manufactured goods, what should do government do?

1 answer:

7 0

To protect consumers from potentially dangerous manufactured goods, the U.S. government is most likely to use Tariff. To protect consumers from potentially dangerous manufactured goods, the U.S. government is most likely to use Tariff.

You might be interested in

If you are in doubt wether or not you should drive while taking a prescription medication, you should

yan [13]

Answer:

A. Consult your doctor or pharmacist.

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

3. First National Bank takes out full-page advertisements in three local newspapers and runs thirty-second television commercial

solong [7]

Answer:

taking out full-page advertisements in the same three local newspapers and runs thirty-second television commercials the same station.

Explanation:

In order to effectively terminate the offer without being liable to pay any reward afterwards, First National Bank will have to take out full-page advertisements in the same three local newspapers and runs thirty-second television commercials the same station.

Anyone give information afterwards will be paid any reward even if the person does not have any prior knowledge of the offer termination. He will just simply be referred to the evidences of the advertisement and television commercials.

5 0

3 years ago

How did Franklin Roosevelt try to increase presidential power?

Sunny_sXe [5.5K]

He tried to increase presidential power by trying to pass government programs to develop the nation’s economy. He also attempted to pack the supreme court in his favor and faield

7 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

DUE TODAY, PLEASE HELP. GHB Sdn Bhd, a construction company, wanted to buy a piece of land. The company promised to pay Sandhu a

Alex787 [66]

Answer:

GHB Sdn Bhd and Sandhu

The prospect for Sandhu to recover the extra commission negotiated with Ahmad during golf is very remote.

1. It was made under undue influence, when Ahmad could have lacked the capacity to make a binding contract. In addition, at that time, Sandhu disclosed that the land was being sought after by many other parties as a way of piling unnecessary pressure on Ahmad.

2. There was no intention to create a legal relation because the additional commission represents a counter-offer. Since the earlier offer was fully documented, this additional offer should have also followed the same process if the company intended to be legally bound.

3. There is lack of consideration to back this additional contract. In the first place, the main contract with Sandhu was made in view of his negotiation skills. So what is Sandhu expected to offer the company in exchange for the extra commission? Nothing.

Explanation:

GHB cannot be expected to promise 0.5% extra commission on a deal, which was equivalent to RM2 million, when an already executed contract for 3% commission had been reached. One can also claim that Ahmad, who suffered from occasional dementia, could have made the promise without the intention for it to be binding on his company but as a way of encouraging Sandhu to close the deal in favor of GHB. Was the deal closed because of the extra commission? No.

6 0

3 years ago

#DATA seems to indicate that there is a negative correlation between years of education and unemployment rates which of the foll

vagabundo [1.1K]

What’s your question exactly do u have an image to show

4 0

2 years ago