A consequentialist approach to ethics is an approach that claims that the morality of an action depends on its outcome. This means that an action is "good" is the consequence it brings is good as well. An example of such a theory is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism states that an action is morally good if it leads to the most happiness for greatest number of people. However, an objection that can be made to this theory is that utility and happiness are subjective, as well as difficult to measure.
On the other hand, non-consequentialist ethics state that the morality of an action is based on the rightness and wrongness of the actions themselves and not the consequences of those actions. An example of this is the Natural Rights Theory, which states that humans have an inherent right to certain rights, regardless of human behaviour. However, it is unclear who has the right to state what these rights are, which has led to criticism of the theory.
They teach this because the same situation will
happen time after time.
<span>
<span>UPS founders wanted to stick to the same procedures and this
will also help the drivers in their decision-making skills. UPS procedure of
handling a package consist a twelve-step process which needs to be completed in
15.5 seconds, this kind of programmed decision help the company move forward.</span></span>
Answer:
The stock market crashed.
Explanation:
The stock market crashed and so people got upset because then their money lowered and then people began ending lives because of the Great Depression.
Answer:
<em>the peasants of France- third choice</em>
Yes, Cinco de Mayo is a Mexican's independence day
