Answer: 1. B. the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics unemployment collection offices
2. D. Monthly
Explanation:
The statement given by Robert Sternberg which suggests that the intelligence is culturally defined is TRUE. Intelligence quotient of individuals also changes with change in regions.
Intelligence is in the culture and customs followed by an individuals or group of individuals in a way that how the ancestors or super senior people have impacted the way of living.
<h3>Intelligence</h3>
- The intelligence of a person cannot be defined in exact numbers but is grouped from a range of being less intelligent to being very intelligent, and it cannot be seen but can be felt and experienced.
- Intelligence differs with changing cultures, which is dependent on factors like the upbringing of such person belonging to a specific culture and the teachings of life left behind by the ancestors.
- The individuals belonging to a culture have different intelligence because of the customs and traditions that have been set as standard practices and followed from such period.
Hence, the statement given above by Robert Sternberg which suggests that the intelligence is culturally defined is TRUE.
To know more about intelligence, click the link below.
brainly.com/question/9944825
Answer:
Two-factor theory
Explanation:
Although employees were not unhappy before the new employee recognition program began, employee ratings of satisfaction on the annual survey were even stronger once the monthly recognition awards were started. This is consistent with the <u>two-factor theory</u><u>
</u>
<u></u>
To motivate staffs better, identify what it is that is causing on the job dissatisfaction and attend to them.
Also, if employees are performing well and their okay with pay and benefits, as well as supervisors and working condition, you can decide to start appreciating exemplary ones in other to make them strive the more for excellence on their own
Explanation:
Congressional investigations not only help legislators make better policy decisions, but they are central to the system of checks and balances. Investigatory hearings can uncover presidential abuses of power and corruption, such as the Teapot Dome scandal in the 1920s or Watergate in the 1970s.
