All categories

3 years ago

For a manufacturer, measures of volume may include:

Business

2 answers:

klemol [59]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

"D"

Explanation:

Volume can mean many thing to different categories of items.While in book it means part of a series , in manufacturing it is the degree of space occupied.

As a lot of objects ,materials ,items , machinery ,manpower and other physical assets are involved in manufacturing process , which definitely occupies spaces. The area of the spaces occupied by any of these group of items is measured in volume as long as it is of a particular height.

Formula is Length * breadth*height

kobusy [5.1K]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

(D) Both number of units produced and amount of direct materials used in production are correct.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Rossdale Co. stock currently sells for $73.09 per share and has a beta of 1.23. The market risk premium is 7.00 percent and the

vesna_86 [32]

Answer:

Explanation:

The cost of equity can be estimated using two (2) different models:

The Dividend Valuation Model
The capital asset pricing model (CAPM)

The Dividend Valuation Model(DVM) is a technique used to value the worth of an asset. According to this model, the value of an asset is the sum of the present values of the future cash flows would that arise from the asset discounted at the required rate of return.

The model is stated below as follows

P = D(1+g)/ke-g)

The capital asset pricing model (CAPM): relates the price of a share to the market risk or systematic risk. The systematic risk is that which affects all the all the economic agents, e.g inflation, interest rate e.t.c

This model is considered superior to DVM. Hence, we will use the CAPM

Using the CAPM , the expected return on a asset is given as follows:

E(r)= Rf +β(Rm-Rf)

E(r) =? , Rf- 2.86%, Rm-Rf - 7.00 β- 1.23

E(r) = 2.86% + 1.23× 7%

= 2.86% + 8.61%

= 11.47 %

Cost of equity= 11.47 %

3 0

3 years ago

What should investors consider when planning for their retirement?

Annette [7]

Retirement planning should include determining time horizons, estimating expenses, calculating required after-tax returns, assessing risk tolerance, and doing estate planning. Start planning for retirement as soon as you can to take advantage of the power of compounding.

Planning for retirement is making preparations for your future so that you can continue to achieve all of your objectives and desires on your own. Setting your retirement goals, calculating how much money you will require, and making investments to increase your retirement savings are all included in this. Every retirement strategy is different.

Planning for retirement is crucial because it might prevent you from running out of money in later life. Your strategy can assist you in determining the rate of return you require on your assets, the appropriate level of risk, and the maximum amount of income you can safely draw from your portfolio.

Learn more about Planning for retirement here

brainly.com/question/22544798

#SPJ4

5 0

2 years ago

The economic analysis of minimum wage involves both normative and positive analysis. Consider the following consequences of a mi

ICE Princess25 [194]

Explanation:

First, remember that the difference between normative and positive economic analysis is that;

Normative analysis take a somewhat neutral view by stating how the world should be. While

The Positive analysis states the facts. That is, it describes the world as it is.

Thus, a Normative analysis of the consequence of minimum wage would be the following statements:

c. In some cities such as San Francisco and New York, it would be impossible for low−skilled workers to live comfortably in the city without minimum wage laws.

d. The gains to winners of a minimum wage law should be valued more highly than the losses to losers because the latter primarily comprises businesses.

And a Positive analysis of the consequence of minimum wage would be the following statements:

a. The minimum wage law causes unemployment.

b. A minimum wage law benefits some groups and hurts others.

4 0

2 years ago

A Liquidation of a partnership LO P5 Kendra, Cogley, and Mei share income and loss in a 3:2:1 ratio (in ratio form: Kendra, 3/6;

morpeh [17]

Answer:

a. Inventory is sold for $608,400.

gain on sale of inventory = $608,400 - $537,600 = $70,800

allocation of gain:

Kendra 1/2 x $70,800 = $35,400

Cogley 1/3 x $70,800 = $23,600

Mei 1/6 x $70,800 = $11,800

Dr Cash 608,400

Cr Inventory 537,600

Cr Gain on sale of inventory 70,800

Dr Gain on sale of inventory 70,800

Cr Kendra, capital 35,400

Cr Cogley, capital 23,600

Cr Mei, capital 11,800

Dr Accounts payable 258,000

Cr Cash 258,000

Dr Kendra, capital 112,100

Dr Cogley, capital 196,175

Dr Mei, capital 146,025

Cr Cash 454,300

b. Inventory is sold for $469,200.

loss on sale of inventory = $469,200 - $537,600 = -$69,400

allocation of loss:

Kendra 1/2 x $68,400 = $34,200

Cogley 1/3 x $68,400 = $22,800

Mei 1/6 x $68,400 = $11,400

Dr Cash 469,200

Dr Loss on sale of inventory 68,400

Cr Inventory 537,600

Dr Kendra, capital 34,300

Dr Cogley, capital 22,800

Dr Mei, capital 11,400

Dr Loss on sale of inventory 68,400

Dr Accounts payable 258,000

Cr Cash 258,000

Dr Kendra, capital 42,400

Dr Cogley, capital 149,775

Dr Mei, capital 122,825

Dr Cash 315,100

c) c. Inventory is sold for $358,800 and any partners with capital deficits pay in the amount of their deficits.

loss on sale of inventory = $358,800 - $537,600 = -$178,800

allocation of loss:

Kendra 1/2 x $178,800 = $89,400

Cogley 1/3 x $178,800 = $59,600

Mei 1/6 x $178,800 = $29,800

Dr Cash 358,800

Dr Loss on sale of inventory 178,800

Cr Inventory 537,600

Dr Kendra, capital 89,400

Dr Cogley, capital 59,600

Dr Mei, capital 29,800

Dr Loss on sale of inventory 178,800

Dr Cash 12,700

Cr Kendra, capital 12,700

Dr Accounts payable 258,000

Cr Cash 258,000

Dr Cogley, capital 112,975

Dr Mei, capital 104,425

Dr Cash 217,400

d. Inventory is sold for $298,800 and the partners have no assets other than those invested in the partnership.

loss on sale of inventory = $298,800 - $537,600 = -$238,800

allocation of loss:

Kendra 1/2 x $238,800 = $119,400

Cogley 1/3 x $238,800 = $79,600

Mei 1/6 x $238,800 = $39,800

Dr Cash 298,800

Dr Loss on sale of inventory 238,800

Cr Inventory 537,600

Dr Kendra, capital 119,400

Dr Cogley, capital 79,600

Dr Mei, capital 39,800

Dr Loss on sale of inventory 238,800

Dr Cogley, capital 28,467

Dr Mei, capital 14,233

Cr Kendra, capital 42,700

Dr Accounts payable 258,000

Cr Cash 258,000

Dr Cogley, capital 64,508

Dr Mei, capital 80,192

Dr Cash 144,700

6 0

3 years ago

The CPA Practice Advisor reports that the mean preparation fee for 2017 federal income tax returns was $273. Use this price as t

larisa [96]

Answer:

The CPA Practice Advisor

The probability that the mean price for a sample of 30 federal income tax returns is within $16 of the population mean is:

= 56%

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Population mean (preparation fee for 2017 federal income tax returns) = $273

Population standard deviation of preparation fees = $100

Mean price for a sample of 30 federal income tax returns = $257 (which is within $16 of the population mean)

z = (x-μ)/σ

z = standard score

x = observed value

μ = mean of the sample

σ = standard deviation of the sample

Z = ($273 - $257)/$100

= 0.16

Using the z-table

P = 0.5636

6 0

2 years ago