ANSWER: "There is not enough information to determine the answer". Option D is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
For a case that was ruled by a court to be reversed by a higher court, they must be conditions in the ruling of the lower court that has been reconsidered by the higher court. This is regardless of the jurisdiction of the court or judge that ruled the case.
A case from all the courts in the options can be reversed by a higher court if the courts judgement lacks merit by the higher court, at any given times, irrespective of the court.
Answer:your mom
Step-by-step explanation:
srry had to do it
Answer:
Compare LHS and RHS to prove the statement.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given: a + b + c = 0
We have to show that 
We take LCM, simplify the terms and compare LHS and RHS. We will see that LHS = RHS and the statement will be proved.
Taking LCM, we get:
= 1
⇒ 
We simplify each term and then compare LHS and RHS.
Simplifying the first term:

= 
= 
Now, we simplify the second term we have:

= 
= 
Again, simplifying
,
= 
=
(C)
Therefore, LHS = A + B + C
= 
Similarly. RHS
= 
Note that if a + b + c = 0, 
So, RHS = 
We see that LHS = RHS.
Therefore, the statement is proved.
Answer: I’m pretty sure it’s 541.8
Step-by-step explanation: