Answer:
Social – The social conditions in France in the late 18th century were remarkably unequal and exploitative. The clergy and the nobility formed the first two Estates and were the most privileged classes in French society. They were excluded from the payment of taxes to the State. On the other hand, the Third Estate that consisted of peasants and workers formed the majority of the population. They were charged with excessive taxes with no political and social rights. As a result, they were extremely discontent.
Economic – As a result of numerous wars waged by Louis XVI the State coffers were empty. The situation was made even more complex by France’s involvement in the American War of Independence and the faulty system of taxation. While the privileged classes were excused from paying taxes the Third Estate was more and more burdened with them.
Political – The Bourbon king of France, Louis XVI was an extremely autocratic and weak-willed king who led a life of obscene luxury. This led to a lot of disenchantment among the masses who then were leading life of extreme poverty and widespread hunger.
Intellectual – The 18th century was marked by a conscious refusal by French thinkers of the ‘Divine Rights Theory’. Philosophers like Rousseau rejected the paradigm of absolute monarchy and promulgated the doctrine of equality of man and sovereignty of people. They played a pivotal role in exposing the fault lines of the old political system, i.e. the ancien regime, and articulating the popular discontent.
Answer: Economic imbalance among European countries.
Explanation:
The beginning of the war in Europe was greeted with different economic opportunities in the countries. Direct participants in the war and the largest European powers of the time, such as Russia, Germany, and Great Britain, had different economic capacities. Germany and Great Britain were financially stable. Waging war in economic terms was not a problem for them. On the other hand, Russia did not have a developed industry. The imperial government in that country was late in engaging in industrial flows that had been current in Western Europe for decades. This was not a problem only in Russia but in most of Eastern Europe. Such circumstances came to the fore at the front as well. The army of Tsarist Russia had many problems, the lack of quality weapons, footwear, and clothing were everyday problems.
<span>The rule of law is an essential principle in the nation but not nearly as important as the idea of majority rule.
The rule of law is the most important principle in the nation where votes of the majority determine the laws.
The rule of the majority with protection for the minority's rights is essential for preserving the liberties of all.
The rule of the majority is the only principle on which this nation should run in order to protect democracy.
OR
</span><span>Jefferson was Anti Fed, so he wanted maajority rule and less central government. but later in his second term, he kept some of hamilton's financial programs (which were heavily federalist), but following the quote, I would say d.</span><span>
</span>
