Answer:
Assuming that more physical contact is associated with higher relationship satisfaction, this study is a demonstration of predictive validity.
Explanation:
The survey above is an example of predictive validity. This term refers to a research that has the ability to predict the future of individuals, based on the analysis of some factors and characteristics that these individuals have. This can be seen in the question above because the researcher predicts the future satisfaction of couples in a relationship based on the amount of physical contact they have had.
<span>The form of government agreed to by the framers at the conventions is a republic that more specifically refers to: An indirect democracy
in indirect democracy, people have the capabilities to influence the government decision not by directly choosing the policy but by choosing for the representatives that they believe will carried out that policy.</span>
Hello there!
<span>When playing games of chance like slot machines or roulette, people often say that a particular outcome is "due," implying that one outcome is more likely because it hasn't happened in a while. this is a fallacy because in these examples the outcome of each trial is: Independent
Games or chance are random in nature. That is, the outcomes are influenced not by the previous outcome, but by probabilistic statistics. In slot machines or roulette, the outcome of each trial is Independent, meaning that it isn't influenced by any previous trial and that if an outcome doesn't happen in a while, it will not increase the chances that it will happen in the next trial.
</span>
Answer:
Thank you for the free points!
Explanation: