Answer:
Covariation of cause and effect
Explanation:
According to my research on different causes of behavior, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the term that best exemplifies this is Covariation of cause and effect. This term refers to the process of establishing that there is a cause and effect to relationship between the variables. In this situation the cause would be reading more newspapers, and the effect would be that the students display more knowledge of current events.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
Harper Lee introduces the major theme of the story by making Cecil Jacobs taunt Scout about their father's act of "defending ni g gers".
Explanation:
Chapter 9 of the text "To Kill A Mockingbird" by Harper Lee shows the scene where Scout had gotten angry with Cecil Jacobs for something he had said about Atticus. When he asked Jem what it meant when Cecil said <em>"Scout Finch’s daddy defended ni g gers"</em>. Jem had told her to ask Atticus herself, which brings or introduces the Tom Robinson case for the first time.
When Scout asked Atticus about it, he told her that he is "<em>simply defending a Neg ro—his name’s Tom Robinson. He lives in that little settlement beyond the town dump. He’s a member of Calpurnia’s church, and Cal knows his family well. She says they’re clean-living folks". </em>By bringing up the topic of <em>"ni g gers</em>", we can know or understand that the novel will revolve around the theme of racial discrimination.
The revision or amending of existing articles of the confederation was the main reason for calling the constitutional convention of 1797. The Constitutional Convention (1797) which is also known as the Philadelphia Conference, or the Grand Conference of Philadelphia) took place in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania from 25 May to 14 September 14.
Though the aim of this Convention was to amend (making changes in the existing articles) the Articles of Confederation, many of its promoters (or advocates) wanted to build the new government instead of solving the issues of the existing one.
