Answer:
Relations between the Soviet Union and the United States were driven by a complex interplay of ideological, political, and economic factors, which led to shifts between cautious cooperation and often bitter superpower rivalry over the years. The distinct differences in the political systems of the two countries often prevented them from reaching a mutual understanding on key policy issues and even, as in the case of the Cuban missile crisis, brought them to the brink of war.
The United States government was initially hostile to the Soviet leaders for taking Russia out of World War I and was opposed to a state ideologically based on communism. Although the United States embarked on a famine relief program in the Soviet Union in the early 1920s and American businessmen established commercial ties there during the period of the New Economic Policy (1921–29), the two countries did not establish diplomatic relations until 1933. By that time, the totalitarian nature of Joseph Stalin's regime presented an insurmountable obstacle to friendly relations with the West. Although World War II brought the two countries into alliance, based on the common aim of defeating Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union's aggressive, antidemocratic policy toward Eastern Europe had created tensions even before the war ended.
The Soviet Union and the United States stayed far apart during the next three decades of superpower conflict and the nuclear and missile arms race. Beginning in the early 1970s, the Soviet regime proclaimed a policy of détente and sought increased economic cooperation and disarmament negotiations with the West. However, the Soviet stance on human rights and its invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 created new tensions between the two countries. These tensions continued to exist until the dramatic democratic changes of 1989–91 led to the collapse during this past year of the Communist system and opened the way for an unprecedented new friendship between the United States and Russia, as well as the other new nations of the former Soviet Union.
Explanation:
The correct answer is B) Averting behavior.
Environmental economists seek to implement a study to examine public preferences for alternative forest landscapes. Respondents are asked to choose one of several plans that depict environmental changes from the baseline condition of forests. The nonmarket valuation method that describes this study is Averting behavior.
When trying to find answers in this type of research to know the preferences of the public regarding alternatives to help the forest, the Avertin behavior method helps researches to find useful answers. When applying this research model, researches presume that people interviewed are prone to participate and do something that prevents the consequences mentioned in the question. It takes into consideration that people will do what it takes in order to limit or avoid the negative consequences presented.
This is what I found... Around 75% of farmers reported on spending 10 hours or more a day for harvesting farm work.
Answer:
Fair Trade impacts workers, farmers and families. By providing supplies, scholarship programs and healthy meals
Explanation:
Answer: Has it not started yet?
Explanation:
If it hasn't something is wrong. Or it's too early!
