1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
seraphim [82]
3 years ago
7

Why did Federalists argue for a separation of powers?

History
2 answers:
Bingel [31]3 years ago
4 0

Federalists argue for a separation of powers because B.The president should have more power than the other branches.

<h3>Further explanation </h3>

Why did Federalists argue for a separation of powers?

A. No single branch of government would have too much power.

B.The president should have more power than the other branches.

C.Power would be divided equally between federal and state government.

D.Trying to balance three branches of government would be impossible.

The Federalists wanted a strong government and also strong executive branch. They also did not want a bill of rights because they thought the new constitution was sufficient.

During the founding of the country, the federalists were ideologically pitted against the anti-federalists. The federalists favored a stronger central (federal) government because of the precursor to the Constitution, the Articles of Confederation, gave no strength to the national government. It couldn't tax the states and had to rely on donations from the states for funds. And also there was no central army and many feared the return of the British, which they did in the War of 1812.

Federalists argued that the separation of powers and checks and balances system created in the new  Constitution protected the people. No one group could control the other two. They argue that the separation of powers into three independent branches protected the rights of the  people. Each branch represents a different aspect of the people, and because all three  branches are equal, no one group can assume control over another.

<h3> </h3><h3>Learn more</h3>
  1. Learn more about Federalists brainly.com/question/3230108

<h3>Answer details</h3>

Grade:  9

Subject:  history

Chapter:  Federalists

Keywords:  Federalists

ser-zykov [4K]3 years ago
3 0

The Federalists were of the opinion that a sovereign nation would require a strong central government with financial, legislative, diplomatic and political powers. Prior to the formulation of the Constitution of India, the Articles of the Federation were formulated only on a regional basis. The country was thereby a loose confederation of states, which could declare independence any time, and thus dissolve the Union. An increase in the powers of the regional Government would thereby pose a threat to the sovereignty of the nation. The Federalists believed that it was important to clearly define the powers of the Federal Government, investing it with the rights to taxation, the right to legislation and the right to conduct foreign policy. However, matters that would require a clear knowledge of regional expertise would be vested with the State Governments.  

Further Explanation:  

Separation of Powers would in a way preserve the versatility of the States and prevents the Federal Government from encroaching upon the powers of the State Governments. They believed this was essential to maintain the uniqueness of the State Governments. The Federalists also demanded Separation of Powers as it would be important to prevent any one branch of the Government from becoming too powerful,  and thereby assuming an authoritarian rule. The system of checks and balances was introduced so that no single government institution would become too powerful and would exercise their powers arbitrarily. The Federalists also argued that the introduction of the Bill of Rights would not be necessary, as the New Constitution had enough provisions for safeguarding and providing basic rights to all citizens of the United States.

Learn more:

1. The powers of the commander in chief of the armed forces belong to the

<u>brainly.com/question/9881795 </u>

2. How were people in the middle colonies different from those in the new england and southern colonies?

<u>brainly.com/question/1720656 </u>

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Chapter: The U.S. Constitution

Subject: History

Keywords:

Separation of Powers, bill of rights, rights of the federal government, power to taxation, legislative rights, foreign policy, checks and balances.

You might be interested in
An example of a secondary source is a photograph.<br> a. true<br> b. false
Elza [17]

Answer:

A.true

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A type of rock that forms deep within the earth when magma solidifies is called
Vinil7 [7]
I believe it is igneous rock

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the primary reason for Vespucci's first voyage ?
Pachacha [2.7K]
<span>Vespucci realized the land he was exploring was a separate continent and not part of Asia, as he and many others believed at the time. The continents of North and South America are named after him.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
In the renaissance what caused the demand for slaves to soar?
sashaice [31]

Answer:

Explanation:

The question – “what caused the slave trade to increase during the early 1800s” – is a little difficult to answer unless one posits that it is a trick question intended to determine whether a particular student has done his or her homework.  Having peaked during the mid-18th Century, the slave trade actually began to contract considerably by the end of that century.  Debates in Europe and in North America regarding the morality of the slave trade resulted in growing sentiments against the practice, with laws being passed on both sides of the Atlantic outlawing the trade in slaves.  Article 1, Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution stated that states could continue to import slaves, but that after 20 years, that right could be abolished:

“The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.”

As soon as that 20-year period was over, however, the Congress passed the Act Prohibiting the Importation of Slaves, banning the trans-Atlantic slave trade.  That Act’s opening provision read as follows:

“Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That from and after the first day of January, one thousand eight hundred and eight, it shall not be lawful to import or bring into the United States or the territories thereof from any foreign kingdom, place, or country, any negro, mulatto, or person of colour, with intent to hold, sell, or dispose of such negro, mulatto, or person of colour, as a slave, or to be held to service or labour.”

With the passage of this law, the slave trade was effectively declared illegal.  Deep divisions between the northern and southern portions of the country, however, would continue, especially with respect to the issue of slavery.  The South’s defeat in the Civil War (1860-1865) would finally end the practice once and for all.  It is incorrect, however, to suggest that the trade reached its peak during the very period when European colonial powers themselves were increasingly banning the practice.  The British, in fact, became militarily active in preventing the trade by dispatching its navy, the strongest in the world, to patrol the coast of West Africa with orders to intercept all vessels transporting slaves.  

Beyond issues of morality, another reason for the decline in the slave trade was simple economics.  Slaves were an important part of the agricultural economies of many countries, especially in North America, but the onset of the industrial revolution made the manpower requirements that drove the slave trade increasingly obsolete.  The American South, of course, was a predominately agrarian society, with plantations providing the bulk of the region’s economic wealth.  As Europe and the northern regions of the United States ushered in more advanced means of production, the need for slaves diminished.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 26 (3.33 points)
Anna35 [415]

Answer:

the third statement

Explanation:

the baby boom is where birthrates exceeded the death rates meaning more babies born

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the Egyptians honor their leaders?
    13·1 answer
  • Individuals actions can help to protect resources by conserving energy and
    14·1 answer
  • Why did many Americans seek a change in the election of 1980? They were tired of conservative leadership and policies. They want
    5·2 answers
  • What effect did the burning of baghdad in 1258 have on the islamic empire?
    13·1 answer
  • Name three factors that contribute to the fall of the roman republic​
    13·1 answer
  • What currency is used in Bosnia Herzegovina?
    11·2 answers
  • Which two countries gained territories as a result of the Treaty of Paris 1763?
    10·1 answer
  • Beyond the basic elements of civilization, what did the Sumerians add to future societies and cultures? A) patriarchy and job sp
    7·2 answers
  • I need helpppp plsss!!!
    6·1 answer
  • When the pH level of a substance is between 7 and 14, it is considered a(n)
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!