Answer:
it cannot be used in trial
Explanation:
you were not yet informed that you had rights, and this is one of the first things that is supposed to happen so therefore they are invalid
Answer:
What is pet sim x, maybe ill try it?
Explanation:
Answer:
The Supreme Court of the United States.
Explanation:
Pursuant to the US Constitution, the Supreme Court has both original and appellate jurisdiction. Original jurisdiction implies that the Supreme Court is the first and only court entitled to hear a case. However, the Constitution limits this power and the court deals with cases involving disputes between states or controversies among ambassadors or other ministers. Appellate jurisdiction refers to the fact that the court has the authority to review judgments passed by lower courts. Frequently, the Supreme Court hears the cases that have already been decided by any US Court of Appeals.
If a person is not satisfied with a decision/ruling made by a district court, he/she may appeal such decision. The case is then reviewed by a Court of Appeals. After the appellate court has pronounced judgment, the ruling may be reviewed by the Supreme Court.
The given statement “It is well understood and specified that the privileges prolonged under the Habeas corpus writ is not suspended until unless there is a case of rebel” is true.
Answer: Option 1
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The case where there is rebel or in case of invasion, the suspension is achieved for the Habeas corpus writ. This is in accordance to the suspension clause of the constitution with the section of 9 in clause second under the Article 1.
The rebel or invasion is for the requirement of public safety as in regard. If in the case raised, then the President, only one who had the power to suspend it as per the constitution.
