1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dexar [7]
3 years ago
11

A government agency has been given authority to oversee business activity in

Law
1 answer:
Kipish [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

B

Explanation:

In order to guarantee these rights are no longer violated the best option would be to take this issue to court. There, the Judge will decide who is right and if they rule in favor of the business owner, the agency will no longer be able to continue such unjust regulations.

You might be interested in
A law that exempts businesses or individuals from state laws is
Nitella [24]

Answer:

Resolution

Explanation:

A law that exempts businesses or individuals from state laws is known as <u>resolution</u>.

A resolution is a kind of a bill that must be passed by both the houses- Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabha and should be signed by the President to come into legal effect.

Resolution Law Firm refers to a firm formed by a team of lawyers which caters to the needs for quality legal services.

8 0
3 years ago
What things can i share that are not hipaa protected
Aliun [14]

Answer:

if you are the patient you can share any of your own information, however if you are a caretaker or medical professional you are not allowed to share records without permission of the patient

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following does NOT happen at an arraignment?
NemiM [27]

Answer:

e.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Guys my B just snitched me for stealing at the mall a whole bunch. I’m 13 what do you think my penalty will be. Thank you really
geniusboy [140]

Answer:

don't know, don't honestly care

3 0
3 years ago
he state of New Jersey says it is sovereign over certain landfilled portions of Ellis Island. The state of New York disagrees, a
aleksandr82 [10.1K]

Answer:

No, it shouldn't. In the present case, it is a conflict of interest between two states: the states of New York and New Jersey, with respect to Ellis Island and the inter-jurisdictional waters of the Hudson River. Therefore, due to being a controversial matter between two states, the provisions of Article III Section 2 of the United States Constitution, which establishes the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in the case. In addition, in case of recourse to the internal courts of a state, a state would be brought to litigate outside its original jurisdiction.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the American court system develop? What is the dual court system? Why do we have the dual court system?
    10·1 answer
  • QUESTION 5
    12·1 answer
  • Explain a current bill working through the legislature and make an argument for or against the bill.
    15·1 answer
  • A fiber is found at a crime scene that appears to be identical to a reference sample taken from an item of clothing belonging to
    11·1 answer
  • What is the name of the court at the city level?
    5·1 answer
  • What would you do if you were the officer in this situation?
    9·1 answer
  • The internet has been a particularly difficult problem for which of the following types of intellectual property?
    13·2 answers
  • Bob ross is a good person but not so amazing that you have to be absolutely OBSESSED with him right?
    10·1 answer
  • discovery in the process of serving a summons and a copy of a commplaint on a defendant true or false
    10·1 answer
  • This has nothing to do with school but I want to go to the boywithuke concert on may 12 and it says 16+ can I (13) go with a leg
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!