Answer:
allocate a portion of the customer's portfolio to "Dot Com" stocks that will not reduce the customer's retirement income below the amount needed for comfortable living
Explanation:
Given that the potential client is concerned that his purchasing power is decreasing and wishes to allocate an increased portion of his portfolio to aggressive growth stocks.
Hence, the best recommendation is to "allocate a portion of his portfolio to "Dot Com" stocks that will not reduce his retirement income below the amount needed for comfortable living"
The answer is $120.
Explanation: The computation of the net profit or loss is shown below: Before that we have to determine the following calculations
Net Profit from call option is = (Gain from Exercising Call Option - Option Premium paid) × Size of the Contract
= (($47 - $42) - $2.60) × 100 Shares
= $240
Net Loss from put option is
= (Option Premium paid) × Size of the Contract
= $1.20 × 100 Share
= $120
So, the net profit is = Net Profit from Call Option - Net loss from Put Option= $240 - $120
= $120
To learn more about net profit, click here.
brainly.com/question/22024991
#SPJ4
Answer:
U.S. Tax Burden on Cola:
The amount of the tax on a case of cola is $4 per case. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $1 per case, and the burden that falls on producers is ___$3______ per case.
The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on consumers.
a. True
b. False
Explanation:
The tax burden on consumers, which is represented by the difference in the price of cola from $5 to $6 per unit is $1 ($6 - $5). However, the cash received by producers reduced by $3 from $5 to $2. This shows that the total tax burden on both consumers and producers is $4 ($1 + $3).
This represents a total tax burden of $4 or about 67% based on the new selling price of cola or 80% based on the old selling price of cola.
"The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on consumers alone. This because the price of cola would have increased to $9 per unit. Since the demand for cola in this instance is elastic, this change in price would have caused a more than 80% change in the quantity demanded.
Answer:
A. Movement on the PPC
B. Rightwards / Outwards shift of PPC
C. Less Concavity of PPC
Explanation:
Production Possibility Curve is combination of two goods that an economy can produce, given resources & technology (efficient utilisation).
- It is a downward sloping curve as more of one good can be produced by sacrifising other good, same resources & technology.
- It is concave curve because of increasing marginal opportunity cost, i.e increasing amounts of a good to be sacrifised to gain additional amount of other good, as resources are not equally efficient in production of both goods.
- Points on PPC reflect full utilisation, points under PPC reflect under utilisation, points above PPC are unattainable.
a) A disagreement between persons favouring more domestic welfare spending or national welfare spending : Is just an issue of reallocation of same resources, technology. So, PPC doesn't change & there can only be movement on the PPC (more of one good, less of other good)
b) An increase in population : leads to increase in human resource & hence the PPC shifts outwards / rightwards as the production potential of economy rise with more human resource.
c) Technological change that make resources less specialised : would reduce resources' efficiency gap in production of two goods. So, Marginal Opportunity cost reduces & hence the PPC becomes less concave.
A.exclusive it’s not an intense level of distribution
