<span>The quote captures Smith's description of the complexity and scope of the division of labor, and its ability to increase the standard of living in a given society. Smith believes that the propensity to truck, barter and exchange is part of human nature, and it is precisely this capacity that best organizes the economic system in large scale societies. The cooperation of the many thousands, inspired by each person's self interest, is what allows for the economic system to flourish, spreading opulence and raising the overall quality of life. Since observations on the progress inspired by the division of labor begin the book, Smith uses the contemplation of simple items (pins, for instance) as a starting point for his theorizing on the organization of economics in general.</span>
Answer:
Dynamic Pricing
Explanation:
Dynamic pricing is the price set to reflect the changes in environment factors and factors that are included in the company's corporate policies. In the above scenario, the company has set a different price in different scenario. The normal customer who visits the store fewer times are not given any discounts however the permanent customer is given discount. This is because of the changes in customer loyalty factor. The company is charging different in different scenarios which means it is pursuing Dynamic Pricing strategy.
Answer:
For both 10,000 units and 20,000 units, the best alternative is Vendor B
Explanation:
Using the information provided in the question, we can write the following:
Annual Volume of 10,000 units
Internal Alternative 1
Variable costs = 170,000 (we multiply the variable cost per unit by total units)
Fixed costs = 20,000
Total costs = 370,000
Internal Alternative 2
Variable costs = 140,000
Fixed costs = 240,000
Total costs = 380,000
Vendor A
Total cost = 200,000 (we simply multiply the price by the quantity)
Vendor B
Total cost = 180,000
Vendor C
Total cost = 190,000
The cheapest option is Vendor B
Now for the 20,000 units:
Internal Alternative 1
Variable costs = 340,000
Fixed costs = 200,000
Total costs = 540,000
Internal Alternative 2
Variable costs = 280,000
Fixed costs = 240,000
Total costs = 520,000
Vendor A
Total cost = 400,000
Vendor B
Total cost = 360,000
Vendor C
Total cost = 380,000
Therefore, Vendor B is once again, the cheapest alternative.
The cost versus benefit test will not act as a good factor to measure tangible achievement.
Explanation:
Most of the Non-profit organization has a focus on welfare activities. The benefits can be influenced only by the subjective fulfillment of benefits. Executive members of all trusts are not able to calculate the benefits attained through welfare operations. Such a parameter system of identifying the beneficiaries' prospects of end-users is known as Intangible achievement.
The tangible achievement always lies in the status of invisible movements of each welfare operations. But each step of inducing the effects of cost versus benefit test does not suit to provide the effective to identify the tangible achievements.