Answer:
Not sure about the first one.
For the second question: d. reflect over x-axis, reflect over y-axis, then translate 2 units up
Step-by-step explanation:
It is reflected over both axis and then moved up 2 units.
Answer:
Sharon would have to run 24 ft.
Step-by-step explanation:
Begin by finding the perimeter by dividing 3,280 by 40.
Then eliminate D and E because they are larger than the total perimeter, and then plug in the remaining values into the perimeter and then see which also gives you the area.
This is how you get the answer 24 ft.
Hope this helped :D
Answer:
37.57 + 1.95x
Step-by-step explanation:
The cost of the shoes is a constant, and we don't know how many socks she bought, but we know that for every pair of socks she bought, they cost would be 1.95. Since we haven't been given the total cost of the purchase, meaning how much the total was, this will be an expression. We will multiply an x against the amount (1.95), which will calculate the price for how many socks were purchased. This means the answer will be 37.57 + 1.95x.
I will clarify a little bit more on why the other answers are incorrect. The first option is 37.57x + 1.95. This is incorrect because the question is not asking how many shoes were bought, but it is questioning how many socks were bought. Option number two states 37.57x + 1.95x. This means that the number of socks and shoes are both unknown, and the question does not state that. Also, another point to make would be that we could also add these variables together, and we do not want that. Option number three states 37.57 + 1.95 + x. X cannot be a separate variable, because by stating that, it means that there would be one more object that was bought that is unknown. I hope this helps you understand my explanation a bit more.
Have a great day, and best of luck for your math problem!
Answer:
I hope this helps :D
Step-by-step explanation:
4
It can be done a lot easier: instead of calculating the probability of one head, two heads, three heads, ... one just needs to calculate the probability of no heads: that is simply 0.5
0.5
n
. If you subtract it from 1, you get the probability you want: it's because that's the chance of not no heads, meaning at least one head. So, the formula is: 1−0.5
1
−
0.5
n
More formally: if X is throwing at least one head,
()=1−(¬)
P
(
X
)
=
1
−
P
(
¬
X
)
, where ¬
¬
X
is throwing zero heads.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
The equation of the line into point-slope form is equal to
we have
substitute
----> equation of the line into point-slope form
