I’m not sure but africa, south america & India
The answer would be : Concurrent power
Concurrent power is a power that could be exercised by both the State and Federal Government, including :
- Regulating the rules of election
- Collecting and Imposing Taxes
- Borrowing money from the reserve
- Imposing Court laws
As someone working on deliberative democracy and its practices, I think we should not exaggerate electoral accountability. Of course it is better than nothing however it is not an effective way of ensuring a democratic system. At the end of the day, we are talking about a power that can be used every 4 or 5 years. Such power is simply not powerful. The lack of citizen power in politics is a systemic issue. Unless the ideas and perspectives of citizens are transmitted to the political arena, we cannot talk about the power of people.
Education is crucially important. With better education people's voting preferences might have better bases. However, this does not make the system any more democratic than it is now unless people have more chances of effecting the policy making. This needs a better systemic environment than electoral politics. Here, I think deliberative and participatory models offer great ways of political decision-making.
<h3>hope it's help you </h3><h3>plz mark as brain list ........!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</h3>
<span>D. In a planned economy, the factors of production are held exclusively by the State authority. In contrast, a market economy (A) allows for private enterprise while a mixed economy (B) has parts of both a market and a planned economy, and is the major form that most western nations use. An open economy (C) is the form used by countries that allows for imports and exports of goods and services.</span>
Under the Indian construction law approved
