Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
Answer: Flora, fauna, mountains, rivers, plains, geothermic sites, monuments can be exploited by public.
Explanation:
Flora: The diversity of flora can be specific or confined to a particular community or region so the protection against its exploitation is suggested as some of the plants are of economic value.
Fauna: Like plants, animals, birds and other faunal species are also confined to local placed and their are also of economic value so their exploitation must be protected from hunting, poaching, and wildlife trafficking.
Resources like mountains, plains, rivers, oceans, geothermic sites must be protected against human exploitation. Like mountains can be removed from their sites for construction of roads and for other kinds of infrastructure. River, ocean water can be contaminated with agricultural waste, sewage sludge, industrial waste, some monuments can be broken to create buildings.
Action report can be created and at the individual level people must be punished according to the environmental laws.
Answer:
A secondary Source.
Explanation:
The history book is written by a person who heard of the history events. He/She was not Physically there.
Answer:
American Evaluation Association
Explanation:
They created this principles to reflect their core value and they are supposed to be a guide to the professional ethical conduct of the evaluators.
This principles are interdependent and interconnected, this means that the can't work by themselves, or even that they may even conflict with one another.
They are used to moderate the behavior of the evaluator.
Answer:
its themselves it is incorrect
Explanation:
please mark me brainliest
