Answer:
I lije happy and Peace society whre I can live safely without any <em><u>conflict</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>
Answer:
A)
Explanation:
The main difference between these two terms is that a concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority. Each of which tends to ocurr often in court cases where various judges analyze and pass judgment of another judges decision on a specific case. With a concurring opinion most, if not all, judges agree with the decision that has been made but tend to give different reasons as to why they believe the decision was justified.
Answer:
The student chemist would be melting. Melting would be the correct option, my guy.
Explanation:
The tendency to overestimate the accuracy of our knowledge and judgments is called <u>Overconfidence</u>.
The overconfidence effect is a well-established bias in which subjective confidence in one's judgment is consistently greater than objective accuracy, especially when confidence is relatively high. Overconfidence is an example of subjective probability misadjustment.
Throughout the research literature, overconfidence is defined in three different ways by him. About the placement of one's performance in relation to others. Excessive accuracy in expressing undue confidence in the accuracy of one's beliefs.
The most common way to study overconfidence is to ask how confident you are about a particular belief or answer you hold. The data show that confidence systematically outweighs accuracy.
Learn more about Overconfidence here : brainly.com/question/25324915
#SPJ4
