Answer:
The correct answer is:
Post hoc fallacy.
Explanation:
The post hoc fallacy is an argument based in the fact that an event happens just after the other, in this case it does not mean that just because the historian predicted the fact the result is a consequence of what he said, or that what he said was true. In this order, the fallacy uses the temporal consequence as an argument. Nevertheless, it is important to consider that temporal sequence is naturally part of the causality process.
The Liberal party of Canada represent all the classes of the people in the country.
<h3>What is the Liberal party of Canada?</h3>
The party stands as one of the major parties in the country since the establishment of the Canada in 1867. It has been the governing party at the federal level for most of the period since the late 1890s that brought together a pragmatic social policy reformers and advocates of free enterprise as well as achieving the balance between them shifting as leaders and context changed.
This party has been described as a brokerage party in recognition of its success in appealing to a range of interests divided by region, language, ethnicity and social class.
Read more about Liberal party
brainly.com/question/15677280
#SPJ1
The answer is superseding. An intervening cause will by and large clear the tortfeasor of obligation for the casualty's damage just if the occasion is esteemed a superseding cause. A superseding cause is an unforeseeable intervening cause. By differentiate, a predictable intervening cause commonly does not break the chain of causality, implying that the tortfeasor is as yet in charge of the casualty's damage—unless the occasion prompts an unforeseeable outcome.
Hay una idea sobre la religión que puede incomodar tanto a ateos como a creyentes. Su universalidad hace pensar que está inscrita en el cerebro humano gracias a la selección natural, porque cumple alguna función que ayudó a los creyentes a sobrevivir. Los humanos habríamos evolucionado para crecer con el germen de la fe en algún tipo de dios o dioses, del mismo modo que, según planteó Noam Chomsky hace décadas, los niños vienen al mundo con estructuras neuronales que les permiten aprender el idioma de sus padres. Después, el entorno es el que determina el lenguaje o la religión particular que se aprende.
