Answer:
skimming the passage, we’ll find “some critics” mentioned in the third sentence. Indeed, this sentence actually continues to advance Bigsby’s view mentioned in the previous sentence (that Hansberry’s work has “unintentional” irony” that the author seems to reject (stating that we should accept her irony as “deliberate social commentaries”). This third sentence continues to elaborate and broaden the critical view to other critics. The next sentence contains the words “for example,” so that must be the one, right?! Nope. This is the trap; the question specifically mentioned “examples” ad does this fourth sentence of the paragraph, but the “examples” need to refute this view, and the example in the fourth sentence is an example of the critical view the author disagreed with.
Explanation:
An important thing to keep in mind about the Reading Comprehension section of the GRE as we use PowerPrep online to study is that it is just that—reading comprehension. In other words, as difficult as it may seem, and it can be pretty tricky, the test makers will always give us all the information we need in the passage to answer the question. Select-in-passage questions, like number 8 on the second Verbal section of practice test 1, may look different than other questions, but they abide by the same rule.
Select-in-passage questions are unique to the GRE, but that shouldn’t scare us. In fact, a good thing about them is that we can approach each one the same way: we need to read the question carefully in order to find out what criteria our sentence needs to meet. Then, we need to search the passage for a sentence that fits that criteria—ok, admittedly this is sometimes more easily said than done, but we should keep in mind that our question may even give us extra clues as to where to look.
Analogy is a form of comparison between two or among at least three things, especially when the things are not alike in a clear or in an obvious manner. ... Once again, the correct answer is "analogy."
Explanation:
We can deduce here that Phaeton asked his father to allow him to drive the sun across the sky because: He had entered into a chariot race with Epaphus.
<h3>Who is Phaeton?</h3>
Phaeton was allegedly known to be the son of the sun god, Helios. Helios wanted to confirm that Phaeton was his son, he decided to grant Phaeton anything he requested. Then Phaeton decided to drive the sun god's chariot.
Thus, we see that Phaeton had entered into a chariot race with Epaphus. This is why he asked his father to allow him to drive the sun across the sky.
Learn more about Phaeton on brainly.com/question/15075579
#SPJ1
<span>The men are apparently talking about Tom Robinson. The reader can infer that Heck Tate is nervous that something might happen to Tom. He talks about moving Tom to the county jail the next day and says, "I don't look for any trouble, but I can't guarantee there won't be any..." Another man, Mr. Link Deas, says that he is worried about "that Old Sarum bunch," referring to the people who live in the northern part of the county. Deas asks if Heck might be able to get a change of venue for the trial, but the sheriff replies that there is not much point in doing that now............ dont know if this helps</span>
