1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vladimir [108]
3 years ago
9

Under United States law, an element of a crime is one of a set of facts that must be what to convict a defendant of a crime

Law
1 answer:
den301095 [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Under United States law, an element of a crime (or element of an offense) is one of a set of facts that must all be proven to convict a defendant of a crime.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why should the state provide free legal assistance to those<br>charged with really serious crimes?​
viktelen [127]

Access to justice is now more critical than ever. within the u. s., Americans need a lawyer’s help for everything from avoiding an unjust eviction to preventing a wrongful conviction. Yet, effective legal assistance remains out of reach for the bulk of american citizens. The gap between legal needs and also the services available exacerbates systemic inequities and downsides that may only grow over the subsequent four years. This series examines the state of access to justice within the u. s. and the way public and personal actors can collaborate to create justice equal for all Americans.

For two years, Mary Hicks paid $975 per month for a run-down Washington, D.C., apartment. When she contacted the owner about mold and mildew within the bathroom and holes within the walls, he did nothing. After Mary began to withhold rent, her landlord sued her.

Mary sought help from a law clinic. Her student attorneys not only kept her from being evicted and ensured that her landlord made the repairs but also reduced her rent to $480 after discovering that her unit was rent-controlled.1

Mary was fortunate. While 90 to 95 percent of landlords are represented by lawyers before the owner and Tenant Branch of the D.C. judicature, only 5 to 10 percent of tenants have legal assistance.2 Unlike criminal defendants, parties in civil cases don't have a generalized right to counsel. While all states provide a right to counsel for a minimum of some styles of civil cases, most parties in civil cases that involve high stakes and basic human needs, like housing, don't have a right to representation.3

In more than three-fourths of all civil trial cases within the u. s., a minimum of one litigant doesn't have a lawyer.4 Figures are even starker when it involves family law, violence, housing, and small-claims matters—those involving disputes over amounts up to $25,000, betting on the state. a minimum of one party lacks representation in 70 to 98 percent of those cases.5

And these are just the Americans who make it to court. Without access to legal advice, many are unaware of their legal rights and potential claims. Past estimates and more moderen state-by-state studies suggest that about 80 percent of the civil legal needs of these living in poverty go unmet6 in addition as 40 to 60 percent of the requirements of middle-income Americans.7 But because these figures rely upon self-selection and self-reporting, however, and since many Americans don't identify their unmet legal needs in and of itself, it's impossible to estimate Americans’ total unmet legal needs.8

To deny Americans access to legal assistance is to deny them their rights and protections. this can be because, to a greater degree than other countries, the u. s. places the burden on a private to hunt justice by visiting court.9 Other developed democracies have enshrined the proper to counsel in civil cases and devote 3 to 10 times more funding to civil legal aid than the u. s..10 In areas from environmental regulation and workplace discrimination to civil rights and housing, Americans must hire or find their own attorneys to enforce the law. The result's a divide between those that can afford legal assistance and people who cannot.

This issue brief is that the first during a series that examines access to justice as a long-neglected policy concern integral to American democracy—one that's under threat from the approaching administration.11 It provides important information on the U.S. justice gap and makes the case for prioritizing improvements in civil aid and indigent defense through legislative and infrastructure initiatives. It also outlines steps that state legislators, courts, and out of doors actors, like advocacy organizations, can desire make justice equal.

6 0
2 years ago
1. Is Defensible Space Theory a logical explanation for controlling crime? Why or why not?
Kaylis [27]

Answer:

See explaination

Explanation:

1. The Defensible Space Theory can really be seen as a logical explanation for controlling crime from the perspectives of a defender as well as an attacker. This theory makes use of the science of psychology with the science of meaningful space. When the defender, that is, the home owners will be responsible for their home space, the sense of responsibility will be higher on the same. The home owners will be accountable for their defense. This encourages home owners to design their home space in such a way that they will be able to control their environment based on their present capabilities like family structure, income level, and socioeconomic status. The attacker, that is, the potential criminal will feel insecure and uncomfortable on a highly defended land. So, the probability of the criminal attacking the home space or neighborhood may be lessened. This argument is supported by the study which involved private homes in two high-crime areas in St. Louis. These areas recorded lower crimes than public areas using the Defensible Space Theory.

2. According to the Routine Activity Theory, the condition for crime is the presence of a suitable target(s) and the absence of a guardian(s). It is important to note that something or the other will always be present to motivate potential offenders to commit crime. So, there will always be motivated offenders. If motivated offenders are present, so suitable targets will be present in the society on the other side for crime to take place. So, suitable targets cannot be left unguarded which will increase the probability of crime, considering the target is in an isolated position. Even a weak guardian is sometimes equivalent to no guardian or protector. So, I think, presence of guardian(s), more specifically, more capable guardian(s) plays the greatest role at reducing

8 0
2 years ago
why did california pass the three strikes law? why do you think these laws have become so popular in the united states
Wittaler [7]

Answer:

they believed the law would help to slow the rate of crime

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Please help!!<br> What can be done to begin to heal the political divisions we see today?
german

Answer:

change the world or rights something like that

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
4. What was the purpose of House Bill 2398?
zimovet [89]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • this term refers to the laws that protect citizens from undue or unwarranted government intrusion into their lives, either perso
    11·2 answers
  • Why might a scientist choose to do field work instead of a laboratory experiment?
    7·1 answer
  • In June, Leslie wins a cash prize of $2,000. She plans to use this money to pay her tuition bill in September. Leslie puts this
    9·1 answer
  • Do ordain and establish this constitution for the united states of america meaning
    6·1 answer
  • Which Article in the Constitution establishes the Legislative Branch?
    7·1 answer
  • What do you believe is the best form of government to live under? Why?
    13·1 answer
  • Describe some alternative means for deciding questions of representation.
    14·1 answer
  • In which case did the party in question have the contractual capacity to make a valid contract?
    6·1 answer
  • What is the coefficient of WHAT ARE TOUGHS?
    15·1 answer
  • Why are some forms of speech not protected by the First Amendment?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!