Answer and explanation:
Character chosen for the following analysis: Mr. Darcy.
Mr. Darcy is one of the main characters of the romantic novel written by Jane Austen, Pride and Prejudice. He's a very rich, very serious young man that does not show any kind of interest in meeting young ladies (unlike he's closest friend) since he has an arranged marriage from a really young age.
This goes around this way until he meets Elizabeth Bennet, a young lady that will change all of his world all of a sudden, but, of course, this plot twist will show slowly along the whole novel.
Their relationships seems rough at first and they act more like two people that can't stan each other, but progressively they find out that they have a similar mind on various topics of interest. So from there on, their relationship starts getting better, more friendly, until it develops into something more.
Answer:
A "Although the ruler of a small nation, King Leopold had deep pockets and an obsessive desire to own an empire." (Paragraph 5)
C "Leopold determined the nature of its administration, and Leopold was the principal recipient of such profits as accrued from the undertaking." (Paragraph
Explanation:
Part A's answer is option A.
King Leopold had an obsessive desire to own an empire which is why he wanted the African territory of the Congo.
He believed that the wealth the country possessed was wasted on the African inhabitants which was why he ruled the country and determined the nature of its administration personally and any profits that came from the Congo went to him first.
Answer: A) Instead of horses pulling carriages full of people, people pull carriages full of horses.
Explanation: an irony is a state of affairs or an event that seems contrary to what one expects and it often has an amusing result. A situational irony is when what happens is the contrary to what the characters or the audience are expecting to happen. From the given options, the sentence that describes an example of situational irony in Gulliver's Travels, is the corresponding to option A, because it is the contrary of what one would expect.
