Answer:
c. Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence.
Explanation:
Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence. Sally is obligated for his carelessness. Since Sally employed Glen and the obligation of any carelessness turns into Sally's inevitably.
Answer:
How are the cases similar to each other? In other words, why would the earlier case be a precedent in the decision for the other?
What are the main arguments for each side in the Vernonia v. Acton case? What details does each side use to support their opinion?
Which side in the Vernonia v. Acton case had the stronger argument and why? (It's okay to choose either side. You will not be graded on your opinion, but rather on how well you support it with facts. Remember that even Supreme Court justices do not always agree!) pls keep it organized
Explanation:
Answer:
On May 12, 2017, a shooting and hostage crisis took place in the village of Kirkersville, Ohio. Three people, including the local police chief, were killed. The events began when Kirkersville Police Chief Steven Eric Disario responded to reports of an armed man, and was shot and killed during a shootout.
A Zanesville police officer and a former Zanesville police sergeant have been indicted in connection to a recent shooting incident in Licking County. On Wednesday, Charles A. Lewis, 34, of Gnaddenhutten, was indicted on one count each discharge of a firearm on or near prohibited premises, a third-degree felony; improper handling firearms in a motor vehicle, a fourth-degree felony; and first-degree misdemeanor using weapons while intoxicated.
According to Assistant Licking County Prosecutor Eric Depue, on Feb. 1, Licking County Law enforcement responded to reports of someone firing a weapon out of a moving vehicle on Ohio 16 eastbound near Marne Road in Newark. The vehicle was determined to be a 2015 Ford Fusion. Defense attorney Derrick Moorehead said his client disputed the allegation the AR-15 was found in the front of the vehicle, saying the firearm was actually located in the rear of the vehicle. Moorehead requested Miracle be considered for community control, noting recidivism was unlikely the case. He also noted he filed a petition for driving privileges on behalf of his client. Moorehead asked Branstool to consider that aside from the shooting incident, his client was a productive citizen for his whole life.
Explanation:
Answer:
The “reasonable person” is a hypothetical individual who approaches any situation with the appropriate amount of caution and then sensibly takes action
Explanation:
The “reasonable person” is a hypothetical individual who approaches any situation with the appropriate amount of caution and then sensibly takes action. It is a standard created to provide courts and juries with an objective test that can be used in deciding whether a person's actions constitute negligence.