Answer:
there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
A marketing organization claims that more than 10% of its employees are paid minimum wage.
The null hypothesis is:
The alternative hypothesis is:
If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted
i.e Decision Rule: fails to reject the null hypothesis
Then the interpretation of the decision is that, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
<span>24 3-pound bags(72 pounds) and 10 5-pound bags(50 pounds). 72+50 = 122 pounds, 24+10 bags = 34 bags</span>
Answer:
There are two types of variables-independent and dependent. ... Answer: An independent variable is exactly what it sounds like. It is a variable that stands alone and isn't changed by the other variables you are trying to measure. For example, someone's age might be an independent variable.
Step-by-step explanation:
This may help you
Answer:
- perimter of original rectangle = <u>17. 6 mm</u>
- side length of the enlarged rectangle = <u>23. 22 mm</u>
- perimeter of the enlarged rectangle = <u>95. 04 mm</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>PERIMETER</u><u> </u><u>OF</u><u> </u><u>ORIGINAL</u><u> </u><u>RECTANGLE</u>
- Length of original rectangle = 4.5 mm
- Width of original rectangle = 4.3 mm
<em>perimeter = 2 × ( length + width)</em>
= 2 × ( 4.5 + 4.3)
= 2 × 8.8
= 17. 6 mm
<u>SIDE</u><u> </u><u>LENGTH</u><u> </u><u>OF</u><u> </u><u>ENLARGED</u><u> </u><u>RECTANGLE</u>
- Width of original rectangle = 4. 5 mm
- Width of enlarged rectangle = 24.3 mm
Enlargement factor = 24.3 / 4.5
= 5.4
- Length of original rectangle = 4.5 mm
- Enlargement factor = 5.4
Side length of enlarged rectangle
= original length × Enlargement factor
= 4.3 × 5.4
= 23. 22 mm
<u>PERIMTER OF ENLARGED RECTANGLE</u>
= 2 × ( enlarged ength + enlarged breadth)
= 2 × (23. 22 + 24. 3 )
= 95. 04 mm
