The constant rate for 1 floral arrangement is $5.00 and inital value is $20.00
Equation: f(z)=20+5z
Step-by-step explanation:
Given,
Delivery cost of 6 floral arrangements = $50.00
Delivery cost of 12 floral arrangements = $80.00
Let,
x be the constant rate for each floral arrangement.
y be the initial value.
According to given statement;
6x+y=50.00 Eqn 1
12x+y=80.00 Eqn 2
Subtracting Eqn 2 from Eqn 1
Dividing both sides by 6
Putting in Eqn 1;
The constant rate for 1 floral arrangement is $5.00 and inital value is $20.00
Equation for the function;
Let z be the number of floral arrangements.
f(z) = initial fee + 5*Number of floral arrangements
f(z) = 20+5z
Keywords: function, subtraction
Learn more about functions at:
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
D. 5(x + 11)= 120
Step-by-step explanation:
5 is the number of friends, and they have an unknown number of action figures before buying 11 more.
So we multiply 5 by the number of action figures they have (x) and add 11 because they all bought 11.
Then we make it equal to 120 because thats the total number of action figures.
(I know this isnt part of the question but if you solve for x, you find out that they all had 13 action figures to begin with)
Hope it helps!
Commons
“How did Faulkner pull it off?” is a question many a fledgling writer has asked themselves while struggling through a period of apprenticeship like that novelist John Barth describes in his 1999 talk "My Faulkner." Barth “reorchestrated” his literary heroes, he says, “in search of my writerly self... downloading my innumerable predecessors as only an insatiable green apprentice can.” Surely a great many writers can relate when Barth says, “it was Faulkner at his most involuted and incantatory who most enchanted me.” For many a writer, the Faulknerian sentence is an irresistible labyrinth. His syntax has a way of weaving itself into the unconscious, emerging as fair to middling imitation.
While studying at Johns Hopkins University, Barth found himself writing about his native Eastern Shore Maryland in a pastiche style of “middle Faulkner and late Joyce.” He may have won some praise from a visiting young William Styron, “but the finished opus didn’t fly—for one thing, because Faulkner intimately knew his Snopses and Compsons and Sartorises, as I did not know my made-up denizens of the Maryland marsh.” The advice to write only what you know may not be worth much as a universal commandment. But studying the way that Faulkner wrote when he turned to the subjects he knew best provides an object lesson on how powerful a literary resource intimacy can be
