Answer:
D). Their strict and strong opposition to slavery.
Explanation:
Salzburgers vary from the Malcontents during the Trustee era of Georgian history in their 'stern and strong resistance to slavery.' Salzburgers found slavery to be disgraceful and offensive against the principals of christianity. While the Malcontents perpetuated slavery for moving on with their plantation works and ammass huge land for these plantations. Thus, both of them were contradictory in their attitude towards slavery. The former strictly opposed it while the latter propagated it despite holding the prohibitions. Thus, <u>option D </u>is the correct answer.
That they can make things more affordable or even have more accounts for things
A Nurse is naturally compassionate, caring, curious, considerate, and observant. They're trained in school how to use the necessary resources to become better. We are unlicensed, social workers, counselors, and lifesavers.
Our philosophy of nursing captures your intrinsic beliefs and goals within the nursing profession. Defining your philosophy provides you with a deeper connection to those beliefs. It can help shape you as a nurse and provide direction for which skills and specialties you want to focus on strengthening.
A philosophy of nursing is a statement that outlines a nurse's values, ethics, and beliefs, as well as their motivation for being part of the profession.
Learn more about Nurse here
brainly.com/question/6685374
#SPJ4
Answer:
Correct Answer: The mentioned Paragraph is an argument.
Explanation:
In the paragraph stated in the question, it was an argument as a result of the silent point which the author tries to list which are characteristics of strong central government.
He based his argument on the fact that, authoritarian states that are one party states would always lead to a strong central government rather than a situation of the states being a multi-party states.
Szasz points to how people have learned the deviant or odd behaviors instead of hidden psychological causes. Seeing as Dr. Szasz felt that psychological underpinnings were of less value than the actual behaviors (i.e., he argued that there were no objective tests for designating a DSM diagnosis), the more important concept to be understood was <span><u>why the person learned to behave as they did.</u></span>
