1. could you please tell me where the venue is for the meeting
2. this is an important phone call, is it all right with you if i take it right now?
3. we aren't able to launch the product next week because of promises we made, but we will launch it as soon as we can.
4. when you have time, please cancel all my appointments in the evening
Tacos...........................
Bro how would we know if we don’t know anything about the project
B) It is unnecessary to oversee the athletes involved in mixed martial arts.
The viewpoint made in section one is that "State athletic commissions should strictly monitor and regulate the UFC." A rebuttal statement is one that goes against the viewpoint, so it needs to say something about how the UFC should not be monitored or regulated. Option A agrees with the viewpoint by saying overseeing athletes is necessary. Option B states the opposite by saying it is unnecessary to oversee athletes. Therefore, this is the correct answer. Option C says that athletes must self-regulate. While this puts the responsibility of regulating on the athletes, it does not take it away from the commissions. There is nothing here to suggest that the commissions would not regulate just because the athletes are. Option D has nothing to do with monitoring or regulating so it is a poor choice.
