<span>Meiosis reduces chromosome number so that sex cells (eggs and sperm) have a half set of chromosomes–one homolog of each pair. This is the haploid number. CONGRATULATIONS! YOU'RE SO SMART!</span>
Answer:
the fingertip has more censors and nerves connected to the skin as compared to the palm
Answer:
The correct answer is e. the ability to replicate the genetic information accurately for the next generation
Explanation:
As there are chances of existence of life in the universe but we can not say that they will have the same type of genetic material as we have but the ability of replication of genome and the ability to pass the genetic information accurately to the next generation will be the most common feature in all genome because without genome replication and transfer life can not evolve and proceed on any planet.
Therefore replication and genetic information transfer to the next generator is necessary. So the right answer is e.
You can write the argument but I’ll list some stuff to help you write it out
•These warnings should be provided for the safety of people who buy their products because if they’re not, then the company should be held accountable for the deaths and or injuries.
This is because if they’re selling products without safety regards, they are selling dangerous products to people including children, which is Illegal.
The dad on the other hand did nothing illegal. He simply bought this product feeling safe to leave it with his child because there were no hazards or warnings of any kind, and BAM! It killed his child.
Therefore leaving the death of the child in the Companies hands.
•if their product does not contain a warning/hazard ( choking )of some sort, they’re technically saying that the child does not need to be supervised while being with that toy.
The dad felt no need to supervise the kid with the toy because there were no warning signs provided on it.
Therefore, leaving the safety in the playskool’s hands.
The dad did nothing wrong here. Since there were no warnings provided. As warnings are to warn those of danger who buy the product. Since no warning was clearly provided, then the safety of his child was not held towards him.
The company on the other hand, failed to do their job which was simply putting safety reguardes on children’s toys. Since that wasn’t provided, then that makes them (the greatest of the product without safety hazards) the killer of the baby.
- I’m sorry it’s so long and I tried but couldn’t think of anything else that would help defend the dad but I hope it helps you write your argumentative essay or whatever it is!
