1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Artemon [7]
3 years ago
6

A person studying a topic is presented with new information that conflicts with previous findings. What would a scientist do in

this situation?
Question 8 options:

ignore the new information

argue against the new information

evaluate the new information

keep the new information to himself
Biology
2 answers:
Hoochie [10]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

evaluate the new information

Explanation:

It is normal that in the course of a research, the researcher will come across new information that conflicts with the information he had already collected. This is normal because science is something changeable, new discoveries can be reached at any time and totally change what we know about a certain subject.

However, false and erroneous discoveries can also be disclosed, for this reason the researcher must be aware and never conclude what is right and what is wrong immediately without an evaluation being made. In this case, the ideal is to evaluate the new information.

8_murik_8 [283]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: evaluate the new information.

You might be interested in
Please help me i dont understand how this stuff works
sukhopar [10]

Answer:

Balloon 2

Explanation:

Opposite charges (positive/negative) attract, like charges (positive/positive or negative/negative) repel.

Have a great day!

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which structures are the dural partitions of the cranial cavity
natita [175]
He Falx cerebri, Tentorium cerebelli, Falx Cerebelli, and Diaphragma sellae
8 0
3 years ago
Please select all that apply​
Rzqust [24]

Answer:

Cell renewal, growth, and asexual reproduction :)

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Hershey and Chase used radioactive isotopes to label different parts of the phage. They grew one batch of phage in the presence
AlekseyPX

The sulphur would lable the capsule and the phosphorous the nucleic acid.

<h3><u>Explanation</u>:</h3>

Hershey and Chase experiment included growing of the pages in two batches, one in presence of 35S and other in presence of 32P. They then infected bacterial cells with these phages, cleaned them and then centrifuge the cells to isolate the marked elements in bacterial cells.

This was done to isolate which part of the phage is actually infective. Sulphur being a part of the proteins will mark the capsule whereas DNA having the phosphate bridges will be marked by 32P.

5 0
4 years ago
What challenges of life can you see these organisms dealing with?
Nastasia [14]

Answer:Three challenges of life would be finding food and shelter and surviving .

Explanation:

5 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following minerals attracts iron nails?
    13·1 answer
  • In Passage 1, how does the author represent the various points of view on the issue of advertisements on school buses?
    10·2 answers
  • If there are 27 adenine bases in a DNA strand, how many thymine bases would there be? And explain why.
    7·1 answer
  • How is most carbon stored in the atmosphere?
    5·1 answer
  • Bacteria that live on the ocean floor are sustained by
    14·1 answer
  • B. How does the appearance of a seed on the SIMULATION pane chan<br> nce the<br> seed has sprouted?
    13·1 answer
  • How does the usable nitrogen enter our bodies?
    8·2 answers
  • The end product(s) of the light-independent reactions of photosynthesis is/are - Select all that apply.
    8·1 answer
  • JND stands for:
    6·1 answer
  • Describe the process of respiration which takes place in human beings when oxygen
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!