The correct answer is C) they resulted in little or no change.
<em>The outcome of most European Revolts of the 1830s resulted in little or no change.</em>
During the 1830s, there were many rebellions against European monarchies, specifically between 1830 and 1832. People in France rebelled against Charles X, for suspending freedom of the press. Charles abdicated and went to England. Poles revolted against the Russian Tsar, but the rebellion was suppressed and Poland became part of Russia. Germany and Italy started rebellions but nothing important really happened. Later, Belgium got its independence from the Netherlands.
Answer:
Your answer is 2. They thought that granting popular sovereignty would allow slavery.
Explanation:
The Popular Sovereignty clause in the Kansas-Nebraska Act meant the territories <em>might </em>allow slavery and enter the Union as slave states.
Answer:
Confucius believed that to restore order, societies had to encourage certain virtues, such as loyalty, trustworthiness, and respecting your elders.
hope this helps <3
1. Sincere individuals thought that if Native Americans adopted white clothing and ways, they would try first-hand how much better it was and leave behind their native culture, thought as uncivilized by that time. As they would become more assimilated to the American society, the Government wouldn't have to overlook their welfare.
2. The Dawes Act, named after its creator Senator Henry Dawes of Massachusetts, allowed the President to survey Native American tribal land and divide it into allotments to be handed to Native Americans as individual property.
3. Native Americans registered on a tribal "roll" were granted allotments of reservation land. They had to leave behind their culture and adopt the white American one. If they did so, they were granted U.S. citizenship.
4. Excess land after the distributed one to tribal members was sold on the open market. The land allotted to Native American families were a lot of the time desertic, and could not sustain them. The self-sufficient farming techniques were very different from tribal ones. Many of the tribal members didn't want to take up agriculture, and the ones that did couldn't afford tools, seeds and so to get started. Inheritance was also a problem: if there were many inherent, the parcelled allotments wasn't enough to sustain all of them.
5. The government succeeded in erasing a vital part of tribal culture, the common property of the land, setting the foundations for their assimilation and the destruction of their culture. In the long term, these various cultures still exist, despite the government's efforts on the contrary. If the government wanted to protect Native American rights, it failed.
Pretty sure there aren’t any
