Answer:
1. Proportional
2. Not proportional
3. Proportional
Step-by-step explanation:
Mike's proportion
Michael gave $1.32 tip for an order that cost $8.80
$1.32÷$8.80=0.15
Given
1. $2.22 for $14.80
$2.22÷$14.80 =0.15
It is proportional to Mike's tip
2. $1.86 for $10.50
$1.86÷$10.50=0.1771
It I not proportional to Mike's tip
3. $0.78 for $5.20
$0.78÷$5.20=0.15
It is proportional to Mike's tip
Therefore,
1. Proportional
2. Not proportional
3. Proportional
So we are to merge the two equations into one, since both of the equations are equal to y. a = b, b = c therefore, a = c.
We are to isolate x.
![x[tan(72)-tan(55)]=2.2tan(55)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=x%5Btan%2872%29-tan%2855%29%5D%3D2.2tan%2855%29)
The value of x is approximately, 1.9047m
Then, substitute the value of x from
y = 5.862m
Round up, then the answer would be D.
Answer:
The answer to your question is: 28.85 times greater.
Step-by-step explanation:
Data
Salt Lake = 1.585 x 10⁴ dollars
George Washington = 4.573 x 10⁵ dollars
Rate = George Washington / Salt Lake
Rate = 4.573 x 10⁵ / 1.585 x 10⁴
Rate = 28.85 times
Answer:
$944
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>
Interest=principle*rate*time (in years)</h3><h3>
I=prt</h3>
<em>Principle=800</em>
<em>Rate=0.06 (6%)</em>
<em>Time=3</em>
<em>800*0.06*3= 144</em>
Total
Principle+Interest= Total
800+144=944
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
P(A) = 4/52 = 0.07692 which is bigger than 5%
5% = 0.05
0.07 is above 5% which is surprising.
The P(Spade A) = 1/52 = 0.01923 which is under 2% which meets your criteria.
