The contingency theory of leader assumed that there are two kinds of leaders: TASK ORIENTED AND RELATIONSHIP ORIENTED LEADERS. A task oriented leader is one who is most concerned about getting jobs done than with the feeling of and relationship among his team. A relationship oriented leader is one who is primarily concerned with the feelings of his team members and their relationships with one another.
Answer:
If I were to start a business, I will choose Sole Proprietorship.
Explanation:
Reasons why I will choose Sole Proprietorship
* I will be the sole owner and responsible for my business.
* All profits (and loss) will belong to me, means the more I work harder, the more return I (alone) will get.
* I can make all the decisions by myself, without the interference of any other person.
* I can expand my business as per my convenience and hard work, if I succeed I can eat all the fruits myself.
* I can grow my business as much I want.
* No one will be my boss, I will be setting my own working hours and work load etc.
Answer: $1,800,000
Explanation:
The merchandise inventory of Glaus at December 31, 2017 will be:
Begining Inventory = $1,600,000
Add: Purchases = $3,200,000
Less: Cost of goods sold = $4,000,000
Add: Gross profit = 25% × $4,000,000 = $1,000,000
Ending Inventory = $1,800,000
The answer is $1,800,000.
Answer:
January Overheads are <u>under-applied</u> by $2,000.
Explanation:
When,
Actual overheads > Applied overheads we say overheads are under-applied.
Actual overheads < Applied overheads we say overheads are over-applied.
Where,
Applied overheads = Predetermined overhead rate × Actual Activity
Therefore,
Applied overheads (January) = 120% × $40,000
= $48,000
Actual overheads (January) = $50,000.
Conclusion
It can be seen that from the above : Actual overheads : $50,000 > Applied overhead : $48,000, therefore overheads were under-applied.
Amount of under-applied overheads = $50,000 - $48,000
= $2,000
Answer:
D. Project A has a standard deviation of expected returns of 20%, while Project B's standard deviation is only 10%. A's returns are negatively correlated with both the firm's other assets and the returns on most stocks in the economy, while B's returns are positively correlated. Therefore, Project A is less risky to a firm and should be evaluated with a lower cost of capital.
