Answer:
500 divided by 2/3 = 500 * 3/2= 750
Explanation:
You have to interchange the fraction 2/3. The denominator becomes the numerator and vice versa.
2/3 becomes 3/2
500 divided by 2/3 = 500 * 3/2
500 divided by 2/3 = 750
500* 3/2 is the same as 500 x 1.5 = 750
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Managerial accounting involves managers using accounting information to better inform themselves before making business decisions. It involves analysing, interpreting and communicating financial data to managers to aid in achievement of organisation's goals.
Managerial accounting is for internal use in the business. Data is modified to meet specific need of the end-user. For example a manager may want to see sales figures for a quarter compared to business target. This will give an idea if the business is meeting it's objectives.
<em>Explanation</em>:
Second Quarter Sales budget
<u>Forecasted Physical Exam. (Basic at $95 per exam and Extended at $150)</u>
July
Basic > 240 =95*240=23,040
Extended > 165 = 150*165=25,200
August
Forecasted Physical Exam.
Basic > 250 = 95*250=23,750
Extended > 215 =150*215=32,250
September
Forecasted Physical Exam.
Basic > 80 =90*80 =7,200
Extended > 90 =150*90 =13500
Total Gross Sales
Basic=$53,990
Extended=$70,950
Answer:
The most likely result at trial is that the landowner's claim for specific performance will be successful, and she will be awarded the entire price of contract.
Explanation:
When there isn't a statute, the buyer bears the risk of loss when property subject to a contract for sale is destroyed without fault of any party prior to the date specified for closing. Unless the contract specifies otherwise, the buyer must pay the contract price even if the property is damaged by fire.
The inn was burned down in this case after the landowner and the buyer signed a contract for the sale of the property, but before the closing date. The contract appears to be silent on the risk of loss, and no appropriate statute exists. As a result of the common law rule, the buyer bears the risk of loss. Therefore, the landowner has the right to particular execution of the contract, which implies that the entire stipulated contract price must be paid by the buyer.
Regardless of the property's drop in worth owing to the fire, the $1 million contract price must be paid by the buyer because he bears the risk of loss.
Therefore, the most likely result at trial is that the landowner's claim for specific performance will be successful, and she will be awarded the entire price of contract.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below;
But before reaching to the final answers, first do the following calculations
Cash collected $108000
Add Services performed in 2017(not collected) $36000
less Services performed in 2016(collected in 2017) $25000
Revenue for 2017 $119,000
Cash paid in 2017 $72,000
Add Expense incurred not yet paid for 2017 $42000
Less Expense paid for 2016 -$30000
Expense for 2016 $84000
Now
a. Cash basis
Revenue $108000
Less Expenses -$72,000
Net income $36000
b. Accrual basis
Revenue for 2017 $119,000
Less Expenses for 2017 $84,000
Net income $35,000