Answer:
He is age 20 and single. His only income item is $12,100 interest from a trust fund. NO CONTRIBUTION SINCE HE HAS NO EARNED INCOME
He is age 40 and single. His only income item is a $34,900 share of ordinary income from a partnership. MAXIMUM CONTRIBUTION OF $6,000
He is age 60 and single. His only income item is $21,300 wages from his job. MAXIMUM CONTRIBUTION OF $7,000
He is age 46 and files a joint return with his wife. His sole proprietorship generates a $7,790 loss, and his wife’s salary is $46,700. MR. JANSON CANNOT CONTRIBUTE ANY MONEY TO THE IRA ACCOUNT, BUT HIS WIFE CAN CONTRIBUTE $6,000 ON HER ACCOUNT AND $6,000 ON MR. JANSON'S ACCOUNT.
Explanation:
In 2019, the limit for RA contributions increased by $500 to:
- under age 50 ⇒ $6,000 per year
- over age 50 ⇒ $7,000 per year
only earned income can be contributed
you cannot contribute more than what you earn
What is the scenario? You need that in order to answer.
Answer:
D) deduction from the balance per bank statement
Explanation:
A bank reconciliation statement is a document that matches the cash balance on a company’s balance sheet to the corresponding amount on its bank statement. Reconciling the two accounts helps determine if accounting changes are needed. Bank reconciliations are completed at regular intervals to ensure that the company’s cash records are correct. They also help detect fraud and any cash manipulations.
Answer:
$11881.4
Explanation:
Given :
Future value, FV = $15,000
Interest rate, r = 6%
Period, n = 4 years
Using the Present Value formula :
PV = FV(1 ÷ (1 + r)^n)
15000(1 ÷ (1 + r)^n)
15000(1 ÷ (1 + 0.06)^4)
15000(1 ÷ 1.06^4)
15000(1 ÷ 1.26247696)
15000(0.7920936)
= $11,881.4
Answer:
oversight.
Explanation:
Oversight can be defined as an unintentional failure to notice a mistake or error, or an unintentional failure to act upon an event caused by an error.
Both the FED and the SEC should have noticed that the financial system was in a really bad shape way before Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers collapsed, or AIG (and others) needed a huge bailout. Apparently both the FED and SEC were all too optimistic about the market and their optimism blinded them. As always the consequences of negligent public servants were paid mostly by the average taxpayer.
