The government carries out business by making it go through several proccesses of voting and thinking about what is fair or not. Usually this will be in a case of law? I am suggesting this is your question. To answer this, the governemnt will have the law passed thorugh several proccesses. The pres can then veto (not let it thru)
sorry for spelling errors.
<span>Governments are supposed to carry out the business of governing in accordance</span>
A political viewpoint that favors native inhabitants over immigrants is the best description of a Nativist.
Option 1
<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>
A nativist by definition is a person or a public viewpoint that favors the provision of better privileges and rights to native residents and inhabitants of an area as opposed to immigrants who merely shifter to the area. A nativist is not a politician related to and favoring only Roman Catholics to office as it relates to all natives and not just Roman Catholics.
A Nativist isn’t necessarily cruel but every cruel leader isn’t a Nativist. A Native American activist is also a decent description but a native activist need not support natives exclusively, just because he is native, making option 1 the best answer.
Answer:
Option D “Communities in the real world are more appropriate”.
Explanation:
Regarding behavior, cyber communities promotes an effect known as ‘Online disinhibition effect’, in which virtual users feel less constraints in regards with their manners, feeling free to express with no filters, all increased by some elements exclusive from this platform (being anonymous, not feeling the response of the attacks to other person, invisibility, lack of importance on feelings on others, cyberbullying, not being responsible of what one says).
