Answer:
B. Data interchange.
Explanation:
This is generally known to be electronic data interchange(EDI), which involves peer to peer share of documents between business associates or companies you have dealing with.
Here, it is said that an EDI message contains a string of data elements, each of which represents a singular fact, such as a price, product model number, and so forth, separated by delimiter. The entire string is called a data segment. One or more data segments framed by a header and trailer form a transaction set, which is the EDI unit of transmission (equivalent to a message). A transaction set often consists of what would usually be contained in a typical business document or form.
Answer:
I am a democrat.
Explanation:
I am what most people call a liberal, enlightened thinkers who wish for humankind to evolve in a better way both in knowledge and morals. Although i do not belive in god I do not go out of my way to disprove his existence or tell anyone else otherwise. Im a strong beliver in human rights for ALL humans which is a topic that sets us apart from republicans who are more conservative and racist. In my opinion, it is the wish of republicans to set back this country based on flawed logic and values that dehumanizes honest people everywhere.
I'm hispanic but I've noticed white people get beat up a lot less by the cops, are usually more respected by retail workers, make the fairest wages, are taken more seriously, and when given shorter criminal sentances
A potential cost for a government leader using a cost-benefit analysis
is that the leader will fail to consider all the variables that will
contribute to the outcome of whatever he or she is planning, since it is
often hard to anticipate all possible scenarios in such an analysis
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison was a court case that resided with William Marbury being appointed by John Adams, but during the process of his commission, Thomas Jefferson became president, and he and Secretary of State James Madison, added new courts and new judges. William Marbury's commission was not delivered to him, therefore petitioning to the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus compelling the delivery of his commission.
The Court found Madison's refusal to deliver commissions was illegal but did not grant Marbury a writ of mandamus. Instead, the court held that Marbury did not have the right, under the Judiciary Act of 1789, to claim to the Supreme Court that Madison's act was unconstitutional.
The court knew that a writ of mandamus would be the proper way to fix the situation, but concluded that the court couldn't issue it. Therefore making it clear that Congress did not have the power to modify the Constitution through regular legislation.
Doing this, the Supreme Court established the principle in judicial review and expanded the powers by having the power to declare a law unconstitutional.
Hope that helps your question.