Answer:
1.97 times
Explanation:
The formula to compute the current ratio is shown below:
Current ratio = Total Current assets ÷ total current liabilities
Current ratio before any adjustment is shown below:
So, current ratio = $343,980 ÷ 196,600 = 1.75 times
Current ratio after adjustments are shown below:
Current assets = Before adjustment balance + goods purchased costing - physical count of inventory + freight-in charges
= $343,980 + $20,440 - 11,890 + 3,040
= $355,570
Current liabilities = Before adjustment balance - goods not received
= $196,600 - $15,950
= $180,650
So, the current ratio would be
= $355,570 ÷ $180,650
= 1.97 times
Answer:
None of the given options.
Depreciation expense for year 1 would be $37,500.
Explanation:
Cost = $400,000
Residual value = $50,000
Expected hours = 40,000
Working hours (year 1) = 6,000 hours
Now,
Depreciation per hour = 
Depreciation per hour = 
Depreciation per hour = 
Depreciation per hour = $6.25
Depreciation expense (year 1) = Depreciation per hour × Working hours (year 1)
Depreciation expense (year 1) = $6.25 × 6,000
Depreciation expense (year 1) = $37,500
Answer:
(B) Hardening sprints
Explanation:
Hardening Sprints are not allowed because the subject of hardening should be continuously address throughout normal Sprints.
Or if the question has the following options:
Which of the following is not allowed in Scrum?
a. Using Story Points
b. Hardening Sprints
c. Release Planning
d. Using Planning Poker
Answer:
(B) Hardening sprints
Explanation:
Using Story Points, Release Planning, Using Planning Poker are not mandatory but allowed. Only hardening sprints are not allowed.
Answer:
Distributive bargaining
Explanation:
Distributive bargaining can be defined as a type of bargaining system/strategy in which one party gains only if the other party loses.
Distributive bargaining is mostly used when there is a negotiation that involves fixed resources e.g; money, assets, etc.
Distributive bargaining as a negotiation strategy does not aim to provide a win-win situation for all parties involved but that one party loses while the other gains considerably.
An example of distributive bargaining is a supermarket having a fixed price for an item. in that situation, you can't bargain and as such you either buy the item or leave the store.
That results in a win for the supermarket and a loss for you the buyer should yo choose to buy the item.
Cheers
