Answer:
- Sole Proprietorship
- Partnership
- Limited Partnership
- Limited Liability Company
Explanation:
Sole Proprietorship is the type of business in which the liability is not limited. Due to this issue, the owner is solely responsible to pay off the debts of company from his personal owned assets if the business goes bankrupt.
Partnership is just like sole proprietorship but here the partners are the only responsible persons to payoff the debt of the company because the liability is limitless. The burden of the company debts is equally shared among the partners.
Limited Partnership is less risky because the liability is limited and only the amount invested in the business is subjected to the payment of borrowings from the lenders. The limited partner is responsible for his actions which means if his misdeed resulted in fine then it would be paid from his share first and then the other partners are equally liable to for compensation if their is still any amount left.
In the case of Limited liability company, the liability is limited and the burden of the payment of the liability falls on the company. So the investor is not subjected to pay the debts of the company because the limited liability company is a separate entity and is solely liable to pay for its debts.
6.4%
200 from the 5% of 4000
140 from 4% on 3500
160 on 6.4% on 2500
The way economists would probably explain the wastage of
this clam resource is by saying that clams are free goods and are therefore
subject to the tragedy of the commons effect. The tragedy of the commons effect
is a theory in economics, postulated by the Victorian economist William Forster
Lloyd.
The tragedy of the commons effect describes a condition
within a shared-resource system where each user act freely according to their
own self-interest, but their collective actions ends in the depletion or spoilage
of that resource, thus having a negative impact on the common good of all users.
In this case, commons is taken to refer to the clam resources.
Answer:
The correct answer is option A.
Explanation:
Normal goods have positive income elasticity, so when there is an increase in the income of the consumer, the quantity demanded of the normal goods will increase.
On the other hand, the inferior goods have a negative income elasticity. So when the income of the consumer increases the demand for inferior goods decline. This is because as income increases, the consumers will prefer normal goods.
