Answer:
Fixed costs are high, variable costs are low
Explanation:
The reason is that the fixed costs are high because these fixed costs are uncontrollable and their might not be an alternative which means we have to move with higher fixed costs. And this is because most of tasks in manufacturing are handled by the machines not humans. So the cost of maintenance, depreciation, etc are fixed costs which are uncontrollable.
Furthermore, the company has very small variable costs because the company enjoys economies of scales, fast paced manufacturing machines, etc. And this is controllable by investments in another more robust machinery.
Answer:
professional benefits
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this is an example of the professional benefits of listening. Listening to others in the workplace can bring various benefits to the workplace because it allows problems to be voiced and solved which like demonstrated in the question allows for a more relaxed and efficient work team.
Answer: True
Explanation: because they are already considered in the GDP calculation when they were sold for the first time. Calculate them again means we are doing double counting.
Answer:
a. Amount the government would have to increase spending according Economist A = $8 billion
b. Amount the government would have to increase spending according Economist B = $16 billion
Explanation:
a. Economist A
Since government spending multiplier is believed to be 8, this implies that the government has to spend an amount that when it is multiplied by 8 it will be equal to recessionary gap of $64 billion in order to close the output gap. This amount can be calculated as follows:
Amount the government would have to increase spending according Economist A = Amount of recessionary gap / Government spending multiplier according to Economist A = $64 billion / 8 = $8 billion
b. Economist B
Since government spending multiplier is believed to be 4, this implies that the government has to spend an amount that when it is multiplied by 4 it will be equal to recessionary gap of $64 billion in order to close the output gap. This amount can be calculated as follows:
Amount the government would have to increase spending according Economist B = Amount of recessionary gap / Government spending multiplier according to Economist B = $64 billion / 4 = $16 billion
Answer: The amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated and it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred.
Explanation:
A loss contingent is an expense that is based on a future event for instance, if the company loses a law suit and would have to pay settlement costs.
Loss contingents are only permitted to be accrued if the probability that they will happen is likely and even at that, the amount of loss needs to be capable of being reasonably estimated. This way, a proper estimate can be made that will represent the situation adequately.
