The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options either context or references, we can comment on the following.
Here you are probably talking about the Three-fifth Compromise, an agreement reached by the delegates that participated in the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to create the new Constitution of the United States.
Delegates from large and small states in the North and South reached an agreement during the works during the Convention. The proposal was made by delegate James Wilson.
Delegates agreed on the way slaves should be counted to determine the real population in the states. This was an important agreement because, in the end, this would the number of seats that each state would have in the lower chamber of Congress or the House of Representatives, and the number of taxes each state had to pay.
Finally, after many debates, the compromise was that they were going to count three-fifths of the state population of slaves toward the total population of the state. This allowed states from the South to have third more legislators in Congress and electoral because, in the beginning, slaves had been ignored.
Answer:
1961?
Explanation:
In December 1961, only a few months after the U.S.-sponsored exile invasion at Bay of Pigs, Fidel Castro declared himself a Marxist-Leninist, obligating the Soviet Union to protect his new, vulnerable socialist nation.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
To what extent did the "exchange of information" reflect and develop the Renaissance worldview?
Answer:
To the extent that the spread of information to different parts of western Europe allowed the exchange of information to promote the new ideas of this period, after so many years of dark ages during the Medieval times. This exchange of information included the humanistic ideas of teh Renaissance, as well as the information about the beautiful works of art of the time.
Let's have in mind that the Renaissance led to major artistic, social, and political changes in Europe between 1300 and 1600.
This was a time in which authors, thinkers, and artists discovered the importance of the human mind. Great artists like Rafael, Leonardo Da Vinci. Michelangelo Buonarroti created magnificent pieces of art in different buildings and churches.
Answer:
Relatively few people, in or out of the field of science, believe in Bigfoot. A purported Bigfoot sighting would likely be met with the same level of credulity as a discovery of Casper, Elvis, Tupac, or Santa Claus. With only 16 percent of Americans Bigfoot believers, you might just write them off as crazy. But contrary to popular assumption, folklore experts say, Bigfoot believers may not be as irrational as you’d think.
“It’s easy to assume … that people who believe in Bigfoot are being irrational in their belief,” says Lynne McNeill, Cal grad, folklore professor, and special guest on the reality TV show Finding Bigfoot. “But that’s really not true. People aren’t jumping to supernatural conclusions very often; people are being quite rational. It doesn’t mean they’re correct; it just means they’re thinking rationally.”
OK. So what are some reasons why people might rationalize a belief in Bigfoot?
Answer:
maybe both
Explanation:
For abolitionist and antislavery activist, blacks and white, Brown emerged as a hero a martyr and ultimately a harbinger if the end of slavery. Most Northern whites especially those not committed to abolition were aghast at the violence of his action
