1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mihalych1998 [28]
3 years ago
12

I need really help!!

History
1 answer:
julsineya [31]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

I'm guessing, activity for the first one?

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Liza is writing a report on one of the historical figures from the Hebrew Bible. She wants to write about an ancient prophet who
VMariaS [17]
Samuel and I think Moses

6 0
3 years ago
Why did britian leave british india?
natulia [17]
<span>The 1942 Quit India Movement had the same fate once the British government arrested all the top Congress Party leaders.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
In one paragraph, compare life in the Roman Republic with life in the Roman Empire. Include specific examples that explain how l
dlinn [17]

How did Rome go from being one of many city-states in the Italian peninsula to being the center of the most powerful empire in the ancient world? Part of the answer lies in the political institutions that Rome developed early in its history. As Rome expanded its influence over more and more areas, its political institutions proved both resilient and adaptable, allowing it to incorporate diverse populations.

According to Roman tradition, the Republic began in 509 BCE when a group of noblemen overthrew the last king of Rome. The Romans replaced the king with two consuls—rulers who had many of the same powers as the king but were elected to serve one-year terms. Each consul could veto, or reject, the actions of the other consul. Although the office of consul probably did not exist in its final form until around 300 BCE, the idea behind this change—to prevent any one man from becoming too powerful—was present early on in Roman thought and shaped many of Rome’s political institutions.

Roman political institutions reflected Roman society, which was divided into two classes: the patricians, wealthy elites, and the plebeians, the common people. Initially, only the patricians were able to hold political office and make important decisions. For example, plebeians could not join the Roman Senate—an advisory body unable to create laws on its own but whose recommendations were taken seriously by the consuls. To become a senator, a Roman had to have held a political office, and plebeians could not. Over time, however, the plebeians were able to gain more influence in the political system.

Between the years 494 and 287 BCE, new political offices for plebeians were created and access to higher office, including the consulship, was opened to them. Voting assemblies and councils were established that gave plebeians more say in the politics of Rome. In 287 BCE, a law removed the last barrier to plebeian political participation by abolishing the requirement that proposed laws had to be approved by patrician senators before the Plebeian Council could consider them.

The Plebeian Council had real power and influence in Roman politics and some plebeians gained power and wealth under these new arrangements, but many remained poor. One reason that political rights did not lead to major changes was that the Comitia Centuriata—the main voting assembly that elected consuls and other important officials—was organized based on wealth. Each century—or voting group—had one vote, but the wealthy were split into smaller groups than the poor, giving the vote of a wealthy Roman more influence.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What kind of immigration rules did the united states have before the 1880s?
babymother [125]
<span>The Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1965, also known as the Hart-Celler Act, abolished an earlier quota system based on national origin and established a new immigration policy based on reuniting immigrant families and attracting skilled labor to the United States</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the United States go to war against Iraq in 2003?
Sidana [21]

Answer:

B.

Explanation:

Their main reason to go to war in a strategically-led coalition was to disarm and neutralize Iraq's threat with the weapons they held. It can be said that A was also a reason that such happened, but the primary reason was because of Saddam Hussein's government that held such weapons which was deemed a threat to the entire world.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What major themes did the writers of the 1920s promote?
    15·1 answer
  • How does the president carry out laws that congress passes?
    7·2 answers
  • Part:A which statement best address the central idea in the article?
    8·1 answer
  • What were the complaints of nativist about immigrants ​
    12·1 answer
  • Which people were the Anti-Federalists?
    9·1 answer
  • What form of government is the US federal government?
    10·2 answers
  • 8. Match the description with the correct term or name. (1 point)
    12·1 answer
  • What was the significance of the Battle of Yorktown to the American Revolutionary War?
    8·2 answers
  • How did compromise make the ratification of the constitution possible
    14·1 answer
  • The toleration of Catholics in Maryland and Quakers in Pennsylvania are examples of which of the following fundamental values?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!