Answer:
B.
It weakened the Confederacy’s position in the West.
Explanation:
Just took the test that was the right answer.
The 13th amendment abolished slavery, the 14th amendment gave citizenship to anybody born in the U.S., and the 15th amendment gave voting rights to everyone, regardless of race, gender, and ethnicity. How? Well, see below for an explanation!
The 13th Amendment, established completely in December 6, 1865, was an amendment that arguably abolished slavery and any form of involuntary servitude in the United States of America. This occurred under Abraham Lincoln’s administration, and was used as a gradual attempt at slavery vanquishment. The 14th amendment, established completely on July 9, 1868, was a newly ordered conduct allowing anybody citizenship who was born in the U.S.. Similar to the 13th amendment, this was an attempt at more freedom for people living in the U.S.. The 15th amendment, established completely on February 3, 1870, was an amendment in which everybody earned voting rights. This ratification was very crucial to the United States because many people had different opinions and biases on whether certain people should vote. Because the U.S. was very discriminatory at this time not only toward blacks, but toward women as well, this amendment sparked controversy throughout the South and led to gradual secession in states that would later form the Confederate States of America. If you need extra help, let me know and I will gladly assist you.
The Jews were the first to decide that it was their responsibility as the Chosen People to fight against inequality in the world. The ideas laid by the Jews continued to impact people for centuries and are especially relevant in the modern world.
<h2>
HOPE THIS HELPS AND PLEASE MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST</h2>
Answer:
He would view it as bloodsome, grewsome and even scary!
Explanation:
A monopolistically competitive market is, by definition, constituted by a large number of firms that compete producing diferenced versions of a product. Such companies are not price-takers and they hold certain degree of power market and of control over the pricing decisions.
However, in a market that comprises so many actors in its supply side, the market power is splitted in many small units and the amount exercised by each is not very strong. Firms operating in this market structure do not have enough power to affect their rivals through their internal decisions and also not enough power to affect potential competitors and to prevent their entrance. They cannot set entry barriers to prevent the entrance of new companies in the market.
